High Court of Uganda

The High Court of Uganda is the third court of record in order of hierarchy and has unlimited original jurisdiction, which means that it can try any case of any value or crime of any magnitude. Appeals from all Magistrates Courts go to the High Court. 

The High Court is headed by the Honorable Principal Judge who is responsible for the administration of the court and has supervisory powers over Magistrate's courts. 

Physical address
Plot 2, the Square Kampala
10 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
10 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
September 1994
Prosecution proved defilement of a 15‑year‑old by the accused; medical and eyewitness evidence corroborated conviction and 12‑year sentence.
Criminal law – Defilement (s.123(1) Penal Code) – Elements: penetration, complainant under 18, identity of accused; corroboration by medical evidence; evaluation of minor inconsistencies; direct and circumstantial evidence; burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
30 September 1994
Registrar validly entered judgment in uncontested summary suit under O.46 r.2; extension of time to appeal denied for undue delay.
Civil Procedure – Order 46 r.2 CPR – Registrar may enter judgment in uncontested cases; Order 46 r.8 – appeal to High Court; summary procedure (Order 33) – effect of default; extension of time to appeal – discretion, undue delay and finality of litigation.
23 September 1994
Court finds accused guilty of defiling his daughter, emphasizing integrity of witness evidence and societal protection.
Criminal law – Defilement – Identification of perpetrator – Corroboration of child witness evidence – Sentencing in sexual offences.
23 September 1994
22 September 1994
Contradictory identification evidence and mere suspicion failed to establish a prima facie case of murder; accused acquitted.
Criminal law – No case to answer – identification evidence – contradictions and unreliability of witnesses – prima facie case – suspicion from a grudge insufficient to ground charge.
8 September 1994
7 September 1994
Domestic plaintiff’s lack of assets alone does not justify ordering security for costs before litigation proceeds.
Civil procedure – Security for costs – Requirement ordinarily for plaintiffs resident abroad or lacking assets within jurisdiction – Domestic company carrying on business locally not prima facie liable to give security – Poverty is not a ground for security for costs.
7 September 1994
Appellate court reduced an excessive 12-month sentence for obtaining goods by false pretences, finding the plea valid despite recording irregularity.
Criminal law – Obtaining goods by false pretences – Sentence – Excessive sentence – Mitigating factors (first offender, guilty plea, amount involved, remorse) – Plea recording irregularity under s.122(2) Magistrates Courts Act cured by acceptance of facts.
7 September 1994
7 September 1994
Plaintiff injured by defendant’s vehicle; claim dismissed for failure to prove the driver was the defendant’s servant or agent.
Motor-vehicle accident – liability – vicarious liability requires proof driver was servant or agent of owner; burden on plaintiff under Evidence Act Negligence – driver driving on pavement — failure to exercise reasonable care Evidence – admissibility of medical report not annexed to plaint where existence is clear and referred to in pleadings (CPR r14/18; authorities) Damages – special damages must be strictly proved; general damages indicated but not awarded due to lack of liability
7 September 1994