Skip to document content Skip to main menu Skip to search

High Court of Uganda

The High Court of Uganda is the third court of record in order of hierarchy and has unlimited original jurisdiction, which means that it can try any case of any value or crime of any magnitude. Appeals from all Magistrates Courts go to the High Court. 

The High Court is headed by the Honorable Principal Judge who is responsible for the administration of the court and has supervisory powers over Magistrate's courts. 

Physical address
Plot 2, the Square Kampala
Visit website
http://www.judiciary.go.ug/data/smenu/9/High
8 judgments
Advanced search

Court registries

All years
Filters
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
8 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
May 1993
Kabuwo v Uganda Railways Corporation (Civil Suit No. 258 of 1992) [1993] UGHC 25 (28 May 1993)
A railway is liable where crew move a train with doors open and without ensuring passengers have disembarked; claimant not contributorily negligent.
* Negligence – carrier’s duty of care to passengers – moving train while passengers alight and keeping doors open is negligent. * Evidence – oral proof of fare payment admissible where ticket lost; corroboration by independent witness accepted. * Contributory negligence – must be proved by evidence; mere allegation insufficient. * Damages – catastrophic injury and high permanent disability justify substantial general damages.
 28 May 1993
Munyagira v Mutayitwako (Miscelleneous Appl. No. 37 of 1993) [1993] UGHC 28 (27 May 1993)
Civil Procedure|Jurisdiction
 27 May 1993
Stephen Kasozi & 3 oers v Peoples Transport Service Limited (Civil Suit No.680 of 1990) [1993] UGHC 11 (18 May 1993)
Plaintiffs failed to prove passenger status, injuries and negligence, so their claims and special damages were dismissed.
Motor vehicle accidents; proof of passenger status; duty of care to trespassers; proof of injuries and special damages; credibility of oral testimony versus medical reports; res ipsa loquitur inapplicable where plaintiffs are trespassers.
 18 May 1993
Mugerwa v Wagona (Civil Suit 619 of 1992) [1993] UGHC 82 (13 May 1993)

 

 13 May 1993
Mbabali v Uganda Commercial Bank (Civil Suit No. 261/93) [1993] UGHC 27 (12 May 1993)
Civil Procedure|Civil Remedies|Injunctions and interdicts|Injunction
 12 May 1993
Registered Trustees of Kampala Institute v Departed Asians Property Custodian Board (Civil Suit No. 610 of 1992) [1993] UGHC 94 (10 May 1993)
The suit to reclaim government-controlled land under the Expropriated Properties Act, based on expired lease, was dismissed.
Property Law – Expropriated Properties Act – applicability to corporate trustees – lease expiration and repossession rights.
 10 May 1993
Mugerwa v Wagona T.A Skyline Coffee Processors (Civil Suit No. 619 of 1992) [1993] UGHC 29 (5 May 1993)
Banking, Finance and Insurance Law|Contract Law|Breach of Contract
 5 May 1993
Uganda v Ochieng (Criminal Session Case 56 of 1991) [1993] UGHC 80 (3 May 1993)
Death proved and unlawful killing established, but provocation negated malice; conviction reduced to manslaughter and sentenced with remand credit.
* Homicide — distinction between murder and manslaughter — requirement for malice aforethought; role of provocation in reducing murder to manslaughter. * Evidence — dying declaration and eyewitness testimony may suffice to prove death and causation even without tendered post‑mortem report. * Defences — provocation can reduce culpability; self‑defence requires proportionality and reasonable apprehension of death or grievous harm. * Sentence — credit for time on remand when passing custodial sentence.
 3 May 1993