High Court of Uganda

The High Court of Uganda is the third court of record in order of hierarchy and has unlimited original jurisdiction, which means that it can try any case of any value or crime of any magnitude. Appeals from all Magistrates Courts go to the High Court. 

The High Court is headed by the Honorable Principal Judge who is responsible for the administration of the court and has supervisory powers over Magistrate's courts. 

Physical address
Plot 2, the Square Kampala
5 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
5 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
July 1992
Court refuses summary judgment on rent arrears pending resolution of jurisdiction under the Electricity Act; each party to bear own costs.
Limitation — applicability to rent arrears; Electricity Act — Sections 37 and 56 and ouster of court jurisdiction; necessity of evidence to classify installations as falling under statutory powers; refusal of summary judgment where jurisdictional issue is unresolved.
20 July 1992
Respondent’s bidding/sale claims struck out for no cause of action; interim order (25/5/92) vacated; tenancy issues to proceed to trial.
Civil procedure — striking out pleadings for want of a cause of action — pleadings must allege agency where a bidder is said to act for a plaintiff; Interim orders made without hearing adverse party — such orders may lapse and be vacated if time-limits are not complied with; Tenancy disputes and succession in title — factual issues to be resolved at trial.
16 July 1992
Courts may grant guardianship to a foreign national if in the child's best interest, with stipulations for oversight.
Family Law - Guardianship - application by foreign national - welfare and best interest of child - relocation considerations.
15 July 1992

 

9 July 1992
Failure to prove delivery of a filed defence to the plaintiff's address renders service invalid; objection upheld with costs.
Civil procedure – service of pleadings – Order 8 r.1 and r.19 CPR – filing on court record distinct from delivery to address for service; proof of service required (affidavit) – locus in quo inspection refused at preliminary stage; costs for unproven failure to serve.
6 July 1992