Skip to document content
Skip to main menu
Skip to search
English
Kiswahili
English
Home
Judgments
Legislation
Collections
Gazettes
Hansard
African Union and EAC
East African Community (EAC)
East African Court of Justice
East African Court of Appeal
African Court of Human and People's Rights
African Commission on Human and People's Rights
AU Charters and Treaties
Home
Judgments
Electricity Disputes Tribunal
Electricity Disputes Tribunal - 2021
3 judgments
Advanced search
All years
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2007
All years
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2007
All months
March
November
All months
March
November
Filters
Filters
Judges
Anaclet Turyakira, - Vice Chair Person Electricty Disputes Tribunal
Charles Okoth Owor - Chairperson Electricity Disputes Tribunal
Dr. Terry Kahuma - Member Electricty Disputes Tribunal
Harriet Wanyoto - Member Electricity Disputes Tribunal
Jude Mike Mudoma - Member Electricity Disputes Tribunal
Alphabet
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
Sort by:
Title (A - Z)
Title (Z - A)
Date (Newest first)
Date (Oldest first)
Filter
3 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
November 2021
Kwesiga v Uganda Electricity Distribution Co. Limited and 2 Others (EDT COMPLAINT 19 of 2014) [2021] UGEDT 3 (26 November 2021)
Vesting instrument placed Kabale 33KV assets with the successor company, which is liable for trespass damages; Government ordered to contribute.
Electricity law – vesting of assets and liabilities under S.I. No.28 of 2002 – whether 33KV lines and wayleaves vested in successor company (UEDCL); trespass/continuing tort for overhead lines erected without consent or compensation; proof required for special damages (market buy‑out, disturbance allowance, lost rental); regulator’s tariff treatment of wayleave compensation and Government liability for stranded liabilities.
26 November 2021
March 2021
Kaisabira Deo v Uganda Electricity Transmission Co. Limited (EDT COMPLAINT 44 of 2018) [2021] UGEDT 2 (26 March 2021)
Complainant failed to prove ownership or entitlement to compensation; respondent had lawfully identified and compensated other PAPs.
Compensation for land – proof of ownership and possession – weight of documentary and oral evidence – identification and compensation of Project Affected Persons under a Resettlement Action Plan – burden on claimant to prove entitlement – costs awarded to successful respondent.
26 March 2021
Turyakika Haruna & 29 Others v Attorney General (Complaint Number EDT 53 of 2018) [2021] UGEDT 1 (18 March 2021)
Complainants awarded compensation for crops and trees destroyed by state power-line works; land compensation limited to transformer sites.
Electricity infrastructure — wayleaves and compensation — entitlement to compensation for destroyed crops and trees; land not ordinarily compensable under 33kV/low-voltage projects except where transformers or underground earthings are located — contemporaneous Wayleaves assessment forms as primary evidence of loss — claims for houses require clear proof; interest and costs awarded.
18 March 2021
1
>