background image
profile image

Commercial Court of Uganda

The Commercial Court was established in 1996 as a division of the High Court of Uganda devoted to hearing and determining commercial disputes with current jurisdiction (as established under Legal Notice No.4 of 1996 and Instruction Circular No.1 of 1996); company causes, Bankruptcies and intellectual property.

The mission of the court is to deliver to the commercial community an efficient, expeditious and cost-effective mode of adjudicating disputes that affect directly and significantly the economic, commercial and financial life of Uganda.

Physical address
Plot 14, Lumumba Avenue, Nakasero.
18 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
18 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
February 2023
Stay of execution denied where appellant failed to show realistic prospects of success, substantial loss, or provide security.
Civil procedure – Stay of execution pending appeal – Order 43 r.4(3) – requirements: notice of appeal, unreasonable delay, likelihood of success, imminent execution, nugatory appeal, substantial loss, security for due performance – balancing of convenience.
27 February 2023
Arbitrator’s jurisdiction upheld where parties effectively varied arbitration agreement by signed form and conduct; late challenge dismissed.
Arbitration – Kompetenz-Kompetenz – tribunal’s power to decide its own jurisdiction; limited judicial review under section 16(6). Arbitration clause variation – variation by written communication and conduct; informal variation enforceable where consent clear. Company authority – implied/ostensible authority of director to bind company. Timeliness and waiver – late jurisdictional challenges may be barred by participation, waiver or estoppel. Institutional appointment – parties’ consent can vest an institution with power to administer and appoint arbitrators.
27 February 2023
Applicant's trademark infringement and passing off claims dismissed; marks are distinguishable and 'CLUB' is generic.
Trade marks – infringement – likelihood of confusion; Part A registrations and s.36(5) – co-existing marks; Generic/descriptive elements – 'CLUB' and 'Premium Gin'; Passing off – requirement of goodwill, misrepresentation and damage; Numeric distinction (One vs 5) as distinguishing feature.
24 February 2023

 

22 February 2023
Bank failed to prove ATM withdrawals were authorised; must refund the sum, pay interest, damages and costs.
Banking law – unauthorised ATM debits; banker–customer contractual duties; burden of proof on bank to prove customer authorisation; duty to investigate (CCTV, reports); remedies – restitution, interest, general damages; exemplary damages denied.
21 February 2023

 

21 February 2023
A pending appeal does not automatically preclude execution; committal requires evidence of means and bad faith, not mere pending proceedings.
Execution — Committal to civil prison — Order 22 r.37 CPR — Appeal does not automatically stay execution — Ability to pay, concealment, bad faith and procedural safeguards required before committal.
20 February 2023
Applicant failed to prove a bona fide triable issue in a summary lease debt suit; summary judgment awarded for the respondent.
Civil procedure – Summary procedure (Order 36) – Requirement for leave to appear and defend: defendant must show a bona fide triable issue or plausible defence; mere denials insufficient. Inherent powers – Court exercised section 98 to hear an out-of-time application. Summary judgment – liquidated sum recoverable where no evident defence; interest and costs awarded.
17 February 2023
Applicant failed to prove a bona fide triable issue or payments; leave to defend refused and summary judgment entered for the plaintiff.
Civil procedure – Order 36 leave to appear and defend – Defendant must show bona fide triable issue or plausible defence by evidence, not vague denials. Summary judgment – liquidated claims – burden to show real dispute as to amount or need for account. Inherent jurisdiction – court may hear late-served applications in interest of justice to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
17 February 2023
Termination of arbitral proceedings under s32 is an order, not an award; court referred the dispute to arbitration and dismissed the suit.
Arbitration law – termination of arbitral proceedings under section 32(2)(c) and (3) – termination order is not an arbitral award.* Civil procedure – reference to arbitration under section 98 where valid arbitration clause exists.* Limitation – where arbitration not finally determined, court need not decide time-bar issue.* Enforcement/appealability – distinction between arbitral termination order and final award.
17 February 2023
Whether the applicant proved overpaid motor-vehicle benefit tax and when 35% depreciation applies.
Tax law – Employment income – motor vehicle benefit – computation under paragraph 3, 5th Schedule (20% x A x B/C – D) – market value, days of private use, employee payments (D). Evidence – burden on taxpayer to prove overpayment; employer estimates may suffice where credible and supported by context even absent mileage logs. Statutory interpretation – Income Tax (Amendment) 2017 – 35% reducing-balance depreciation applies prospectively with effect from the year ending 30 June 2018 (i.e. from 1 July 2018). Civil procedure – timing of preliminary objections: must be raised at earliest opportunity (mention/scheduling).
17 February 2023
17 February 2023

 

15 February 2023

 

15 February 2023

 

14 February 2023

 

14 February 2023
A conditional stay of execution was granted to prevent substantial loss pending appeal, subject to security for costs.
Civil procedure – stay of execution – conditions for grant – substantial loss – timeliness – security for due performance – discretion of the court – school property – interests of third parties.
7 February 2023
Court dismissed application to restrain guarantee calls pending arbitration, finding no manifest fraud or irreparable harm.
Arbitration Act s.6 – ancillary interim measures; Demand/performance guarantees – autonomy principle; exceptions: fraud, illegality, unconscionability, negative contractual stipulations; Injunctive relief pending arbitration – prima facie case, irreparable harm, balance of convenience; High threshold required to restrain bank payment under on‑demand guarantees.
1 February 2023