background image
profile image

Commercial Court of Uganda

The Commercial Court was established in 1996 as a division of the High Court of Uganda devoted to hearing and determining commercial disputes with current jurisdiction (as established under Legal Notice No.4 of 1996 and Instruction Circular No.1 of 1996); company causes, Bankruptcies and intellectual property.

The mission of the court is to deliver to the commercial community an efficient, expeditious and cost-effective mode of adjudicating disputes that affect directly and significantly the economic, commercial and financial life of Uganda.

Physical address
Plot 14, Lumumba Avenue, Nakasero.
23 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
23 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
June 2022
Applicant raised triable issues over loan computation and alleged failure to provide required independent advice, warranting trial.
Summary judgment – Order 36 leave to defend – bona fide triable issue required; Bank of Uganda Financial Consumer Protection Guidelines 2011 – duty to provide information/independent advice; disputed computation of interest/default charges and requirement for account reconciliation.
29 June 2022
Default judgment set aside where counsel’s mistake and procedural defects showed sufficient cause.
Civil procedure – Default judgment – Setting aside under Order 9 r.12 – Effect of counsel’s negligence – Procedural requirements for court orders (signature, seal, record of proceedings) – Affidavit evidence and cross-examination.
29 June 2022
Leave to amend a plaint was granted to reflect post-filing developments, subject to clear particulars and evidence.
Civil procedure – Amendment of pleadings – discretion under section 100 Civil Procedure Act and Article 126(2)(e) – amendments to reflect post-filing developments; Pleadings – introduction of new cause of action – when sale of mortgaged property may be addressed within original suit; Evidence – requirement to particularise monetary claims and produce supporting bank statements; Abuse of process – late or unclear amendments may be refused.
29 June 2022
Delay in filing an appeal excused where court’s delay in providing certified record prevented timely prosecution.
Civil procedure – appeals – limitation – section 79(1) and (2) Civil Procedure Act – time to file memorandum of appeal – exclusion of time taken by court/registrar to make certified copy of proceedings – diligence in prosecuting appeal – failure to strike out appeal.
29 June 2022
High Court set aside small claims refund judgment for material procedural irregularities and remitted the matter for retrial.
Small claims procedure — Revision for material irregularity — Failure to state basis of findings (Rule 27/Schedule 7) — No inquiry into debtor’s finances or payment schedule (Rule 28) — Improper award of costs contrary to Rule 29 — Matter set aside and remitted for retrial.
29 June 2022
Court granted leave to amend pleadings due to post‑filing events and COVID‑related delays, finding no unfair prejudice to respondents.
Civil procedure – amendment of pleadings – discretionary power under section 100 Civil Procedure Act and Article 126(2)(e) Constitution – delay and COVID‑19 as justification – new facts arising after institution – whether amendment introduces new cause of action – avoidance of multiplicity of proceedings – costs to abide main suit outcome.
28 June 2022
Stay denied where no properly lodged appeal, unreasonable delay and abuse of court process.
Civil procedure — Stay of execution pending appeal — prerequisites: substantial loss, absence of unreasonable delay, security — appeal must be fully lodged (memorandum filed) — unreasonable delay and failure to serve/respond — abuse of process warrants dismissal.
28 June 2022
Application to set aside arbitral award dismissed for failing to establish statutory grounds and improperly seeking an appellate review.
Arbitration law — setting aside arbitral award — Section 34(2) and (3) — timeliness of setting-aside application — scope of reference — limited judicial review, not an appeal.
28 June 2022
Applicant entitled to UGX 133.5M for capital and unpaid contractual returns; special damages insufficiently pleaded.
Civil procedure – default judgment (Order 9 CPR) – assessment of damages after default; Contract – memoranda of understanding – guaranteed weekly returns – quantification of unpaid returns; Pleading – requirement to particularise special damages; Remedies – award of interest and costs.
28 June 2022
An out-of-time affidavit filed without leave is struck off; dismissal for want of prosecution reinstated despite applicant's lack of diligence.
Civil Procedure — Order 12 r.3(2): time limit for affidavits in reply — out-of-time affidavit without leave struck off. Civil Procedure — Order 9 r.22–23: dismissal for want of prosecution — setting aside for sufficient cause; mistake of counsel may constitute sufficient cause. Duty to act diligently after missing a hearing; right to fair hearing (Article 28) may justify reinstatement despite applicant’s lack of diligence. Costs awarded against applicant.
24 June 2022
Plaintiff entitled to repayment of advanced funds (USD 238,000), contractual 2% monthly interest, UGX 150,000,000 damages and costs.
Contract law – breach of Memorandum of Understanding and Refund Agreement – recovery of monies advanced – contractual admission of receipt – offset of prior payment – enforcement of agreed 2% per month interest – award of general damages and costs.
24 June 2022
A contemnor’s failure to obey court orders does not justify striking out the suit; contempt may attract fines and imprisonment until purge.
Civil procedure – contempt of court – sanctions – refusal to strike out suit; denial of audience until contemnor purges does not equate to dismissal. Unrebutted affidavit evidence – presumption of acceptance where service proven. Court powers – imposition of fine and civil imprisonment for continued wilful contempt.
24 June 2022
Court admitted uncontested invoices and receipts without a witness where originals/copies were on the court file.
Evidence – Documentary evidence – authentication and best-evidence rule – originals preferred but secondary evidence permitted under s.64. Evidence – Admission of uncontested documents without formal tender through witness where originals/copies on court file and authenticity unchallenged. Evidence Act – relevance of ss.58, 63 and 64. Civil procedure – court’s inherent powers to admit previously produced but unmarked documents. Exhibits – collective marking as single exhibit (Defendants’ Exhibit D44).
21 June 2022
21 June 2022
Application to add mortgagor and borrower as defendants denied; affidavit by advocate upheld; suit remains between applicant bank and respondent.
Civil procedure – Affidavits in applications – Advocate on party’s legal team may swear affidavit if confined to matters within own knowledge; not automatically struck off. Civil procedure – Joinder of parties – Order 1 Rule 3: persons may be joined only where plaintiff has right to relief against them arising from same act/transaction or where separate suits would raise common questions to avoid multiplicity. Dominus litis principle – plaintiff cannot be compelled to sue persons he has no claim against. Procedural remedies – correct reliance on Order 1 Rule 3 (not Order 1 Rule 10(2)); applicant may use third party notice or separate suit for indemnity.
21 June 2022
21 June 2022
Interim injunction refused where disputes are subject to arbitration and respondents acted as agents of a disclosed principal.
Arbitration – scope and effect of arbitration agreement; interlocutory injunction – prima facie case, irreparable harm, balance of convenience; partnership capacity and “carrying on business” test; agent of disclosed principal – personal liability; independence of advocates and abuse of process.
15 June 2022
Court refused injunction, held arbitration bars the suit and struck out action against agents of a disclosed principal.
Civil procedure – interlocutory injunctions; arbitration – stay and non-intervention where arbitration clause covers dispute; partnerships – capacity and "carrying on business in Uganda" requires actual/sustained presence; agency – agents of disclosed principal not personally liable; legal profession – protection of advocates from suits for client representation.
15 June 2022
Judicial review dismissed: time‑barred, consent High Court order not reviewable, remedies unexhausted, applicant lacks standing.
Judicial review – limitation and promptness; Consent judgments – court order not amenable to supervisory review by same court; Exhaustion of statutory/administrative remedies (Access to Information Act; EAC Court rules); Locus standi/sufficient interest – public interest vs busybody; Certiorari/mandamus – remedies discretionary.
10 June 2022
Application to set aside arbitral award dismissed; capacity, bias and public-policy challenges rejected.
Arbitration – judicial review – limited grounds to set aside awards under The Arbitration and Conciliation Act; Capacity – foreign company contracting without local registration unless a place of business established; Evident partiality – locus in quo discretionary; Public policy – narrow exception, requires substantial local effects or violation of fundamental Ugandan law.
6 June 2022
Applicant allowed to amend plaint to increase claimed sum and plead audit particulars; amendment not a new cause of action.
Civil procedure – Amendment of pleadings – Order 6 Rule 19 CPR – Leave to amend before hearing; Amendment increasing sum claimed permissible where it does not introduce new cause of action; Audit report admissibility not a bar to pleading particulars; Prejudice to opposing party compensable by costs.
2 June 2022
Court stayed the suit and referred the dispute to arbitration, finding the arbitration clause operative and enforceable.
Arbitration law – stay of court proceedings under section 5 when arbitration agreement exists; locus of defendants who filed defence; formalities for affidavits sworn on behalf of companies; interpretation and enforceability of arbitration clauses (appointment mechanism, seat, and appointing authority); premature challenges to arbitrability.
2 June 2022
Default judgment and execution set aside where substituted service on a non-resident defendant was ineffective; leave to defend granted.
Civil procedure – Service out of jurisdiction – substituted service ineffective where defendant is ordinarily resident abroad; invalidity of unsealed summons; setting aside default judgment and execution; leave to defend in summary suit where draft defence discloses bona fide triable issues.
2 June 2022