background image
profile image

Commercial Court of Uganda

The Commercial Court was established in 1996 as a division of the High Court of Uganda devoted to hearing and determining commercial disputes with current jurisdiction (as established under Legal Notice No.4 of 1996 and Instruction Circular No.1 of 1996); company causes, Bankruptcies and intellectual property.

The mission of the court is to deliver to the commercial community an efficient, expeditious and cost-effective mode of adjudicating disputes that affect directly and significantly the economic, commercial and financial life of Uganda.

Physical address
Plot 14, Lumumba Avenue, Nakasero.
20 judgments
  • Filters
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
20 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
April 2013
Taxation award set aside: instruction fees must be based on amounts pleaded in the plaint, not discounted by the taxing master.
Advocates' remuneration – taxation of costs – subject‑matter value determined from amount claimed in plaint where no judgment; dismissal on limitation = decree; taxing master misdirection for discounting pleaded compensatory loss; remittal to Registrar for recalculation.
30 April 2013
A security company held vicariously liable for a guard’s theft; standard-form limitation clause rejected for fundamental breach.
Security services contract – burglary and theft – proof of special damages – vicarious liability of security company for guard’s misconduct – standard-form exclusion clause unenforceable for fundamental breach.
26 April 2013
Defendant breached publishing agreements by failing to account and pay royalties; court estimated and awarded damages, interest and costs.
Publishing contracts – obligation to render semi-annual accounts and pay royalties – failure to account constitutes breach; where defendant withholds accounts, court may estimate damages using available statements; award of interest under Civil Procedure Act s.26(2); costs follow the event under s.27(2).
26 April 2013
Late reporting, unpaid premium and claiming from the third party without insurer consent defeated the insured's claim.
Insurance law – insured’s burden to prove premium payment – breach of policy conditions by late reporting and failure to prevent further loss – prohibition on claiming from third party without insurer consent – insurer not liable for indemnity.
26 April 2013
Blanket ministerial ban on reflexology quashed for procedural unfairness and irrationality; individual enforcement allowed.
Administrative law – Judicial review of ministerial directive – public interest powers; natural justice – right to be heard; irrationality/Wednesbury unreasonableness – blanket bans based on limited inspections; regulatory lacuna – absence of specific statute for reflexology; remedies – certiorari and limited prohibition/injunction; proper respondent in judicial review – office, not private person.
25 April 2013
Defendant failed to prove substantial performance but succeeded on counterclaim for breach, awarded damages, interest, return of books, and costs.
Contract law – substantial performance – burden of proof under Evidence Act; breach by prevention (locking out) – remedies; special and general damages; interest as discretionary remedy; return of property; costs awarded to counterclaimant.
24 April 2013
A court will not stay its proceedings because of a different matter pending before another judge of equal jurisdiction.
Civil procedure — stay of proceedings — whether one judge may stay proceedings pending a contempt application before another judge of equal jurisdiction — distinction from cases where same judge issued earlier order — applicability of Wildlife Lodges v County Council of Norok.
24 April 2013
Buyer’s written admissions and invoices proved indebtedness; judgment for US$29,555, damages, interest and costs awarded.
Sale of Goods Act – seller’s action for price; Evidence Act s.57 – admissions by party; assessment of damages and rates of pre- and post-judgment interest; procedural reinstatement and ex parte proceedings.
23 April 2013
Bank not liable for employee’s independent fraud; employee liable and criminal compensation governs civil recovery.
Banking law – banker–customer contract — written overdraft facility governs; parol evidence rule excludes contradictory oral 'investment' terms. Investment advice — Capital Markets Authority Act limits who may lawfully give investment-advice in securities; no proven lawful advisory role by bank. Vicarious liability — employer not liable where employee’s fraud lies outside scope of agency/authority. Criminal compensation orders — magistrate’s compensation taken into account in subsequent civil proceedings; employee held primarily liable to refund customer. Remedies — award against employee, release of unsold property, compensation for sold assets, costs against employee.
19 April 2013
Judicial review cannot substitute for an appeal where the regulatory authority acted within statutory powers and followed fair process.
Administrative law – judicial review limited to illegality, irrationality (Wednesbury) and procedural impropriety – Regulatory authority’s decision under statutory complaint-handling powers – Distinction between merits appeal and supervisory review – Existence but non-operation of statutory appeals tribunal.
18 April 2013
Court granted security for costs where the respondent company appeared assetless and possibly a shell, and the application was timely.
Companies Act s.404 – security for costs – court’s discretion to order security where plaintiff company appears unable to pay defendant’s costs. Civil Procedure Rules O.12 r.3(1) – time limits for interlocutory applications. Interlocutory applications – case management tool; should not determine merits of main suit. Factors: plaintiff’s inability to pay, risk of sham/shell company, prior related litigation, potential abuse of process. Estoppel/scheduling memorandum – no estoppel absent detriment from reliance.
18 April 2013
Winding up ordered where minority shareholder oppressed and company inactive after sale of sole asset; official receiver appointed.
Company law – Section 211(1) – minority shareholder oppression and appropriate remedies (winding up v buyout) Company law – Section 164 – Registrar’s investigation into company affairs and statutory filings Company law – Section 234 – appointment of Official Receiver for winding up Remedies – when winding up is preferable where company inactive and sole asset sold
15 April 2013
Anton Piller order granted where trademark owner showed strong prima facie infringement, serious loss, and risk of evidence destruction.
Intellectual Property – Trademark infringement – Anton Piller order (ex parte inspection and limited seizure) – Preconditions: extremely strong prima facie case; serious damage; real risk of destruction or disposal of incriminating items. Relief granted limited to inspection, inventory and removal of samples; not a search warrant; entry requires defendant’s permission.
12 April 2013
Negligence or implausible conduct by counsel does not ordinarily constitute sufficient cause to reinstate a dismissed appeal.
Civil procedure – reinstatement of dismissed appeal – sufficiency of cause for non-appearance – negligence or dilatory conduct of counsel not ordinarily sufficient – credibility of substitute counsel’s excuse (attending wrong court) – costs awarded.
11 April 2013
Failure to attach the Registrar's decision and taxation certificate renders an appeal against a taxation incompetent and dismissible.
Advocates Act s.62; Advocates (Taxation of Costs) Appeals and References Regulations reg.3 — requirement to attach decision/order and taxation certificate when appealing Registrar's taxation; failure to attach is jurisdictional and renders appeal incompetent.
11 April 2013
Claim based on an implied contract against the government was dismissed as time‑barred under the three‑year limitation period.
Limitation of actions – s.3(2) Civil Procedure and Limitation (Misc. Provisions) Act – action founded on contract – implied contract from conduct; cause of action and accrual date; policy directive versus contractual basis; statutory notice does not commence suit; exceptions to limitation (fraud, mistake, disability) must be pleaded to extend time.
10 April 2013
Default judgment upheld: service on corporate secretary valid and applicant failed to prove grounds to set it aside.
Civil procedure – setting aside default judgment – service on corporate secretary under O.29 r.2; Taxation – advocate-client bill taxed by certificate and consent; Stay of execution – O.43 r.4(3) requirements (substantial loss, delay, security); Leave to appear and defend – need for bona fide, particularized defence (Kotecha test).
5 April 2013
Bank not liable where a depositor’s authorised principal signatory surrendered a fixed deposit and cheques were reasonably verified and honoured.
Banking law – fixed deposits – interpretation of deposit receipt conditions and whether early transfer to depositor’s current account breaches non-transferability clause. Banking law – mandate and authority – effect of principal signatory’s mandate on cheque payments. Negligence – standard of care of banker – reasonable banker test versus forensic handwriting analysis. Remedies – liability for fraud by a customer’s own officer and appropriate defendant for loss.
5 April 2013
Interlocutory freezing orders granted to preserve assets pending a US$3.6M civil claim, relying on prior criminal conviction nexus.
Commercial law — attachment before judgment — Order 40 rr.5–6 — interlocutory preservation of assets where risk of disposal — nexus to prior criminal conviction — caveats and provisional restraint pending main suit.
3 April 2013
Court upheld Taxing Officer's principled discretion but reduced the respondent's instruction fees to Shs5,000,000,000 for consistency.
Taxation of costs – appellate review – interference only for error in principle, misdirection or failure of justice. Taxation of costs – discretion to depart from tariff where case is exceptional – representative action affecting an industry. Advocates (Taxation of Costs) (Appeals and References) Regulations – consistency and reasoned exercise of discretion in awarding instruction fees. Quantum – use of percentage of subject-matter value (8%–9% preferred to 10% in consistency with precedent).
2 April 2013