|
Court struck down key Anti‑Pornography Act provisions as vague, unjustifiably limiting expression and infringing privacy and property rights.
Constitutional law — Criminal law vagueness — Definition of "pornography" overly broad and vague — Principle of legality (Art.28(12)) — Freedom of expression limitation unjustified (Art.43) — Enforcement powers infringe privacy, property and liberty (Arts.23,26,27) — Evidentiary rules in constitutional petitions.
|