|
A presidential exhortation to cancel allegedly fraudulent titles did not raise a constitutional interpretation issue; petition dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
* Constitutional jurisdiction – Article 137 – requires a real question for constitutional interpretation; enforcement of rights alone is insufficient.
* Administrative action – presidential letter urging cancellation of titles is exhortatory, not a directive or order engaging constitutional interpretation.
* Forum – enforcement or judicial review of administrative decisions belongs to ordinary courts; Constitutional Court’s role is interpretation under Article 137.
* Procedural objections – affidavit knowledge and contempt raised but jurisdictional objection dispositive.
|