Constitutional Court of Uganda - 2012

5 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
5 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
August 2012
29 August 2012
June 2012
The petition alleging government failure in maternal healthcare was struck out as a non-justiciable political question; alternative remedies suggested.
Constitutional law – Justiciability – Political question doctrine – Courts should not adjudicate matters involving policy formulation and resource allocation entrusted to the Executive and Legislature. Constitutional law – Article 137 jurisdiction – Interpretation of the Constitution vs. review of executive/legislative policy. Remedies – Alternative remedies available: High Court (Article 50), prerogative orders, and Government Proceedings Act for compensation claims. Human rights – Allegations of failure to provide maternal healthcare and related rights (right to health, right to life, protection from degrading treatment) held to raise political questions in this petition.
6 June 2012
April 2012
Applicant failed to show irreparable harm or strong prima facie case to restrain a near‑completed Commission pending constitutional challenge.
Constitutional law – interim injunction – application to restrain Presidential Commission of Inquiry – requirements for temporary injunction (prima facie case, irreparable harm, balance of convenience) – delay and speculative allegations of bias – public interest and near completion of inquiry.
30 April 2012
Whether prosecutions by the Inspectorate require full constitution and whether bail automatically lapses on committal to High Court.
Constitutional interpretation – Inspectorate of Government – requirement that Inspectorate be duly constituted before prosecuting under Article 230; Criminal procedure – bail – section 168(4) Magistrates Courts Act inconsistent with Articles 23(6)(a), 126(1) and 28(1); Committal proceedings – committing court may maintain, grant or cancel bail after hearing parties; Constitutional procedure – Article 137(5)(b) referral power consistent with judicial independence under Article 128.
4 April 2012
February 2012
Parliament may form investigative committees, but it cannot constitutionally order the Prime Minister or ministers to "step aside."
Constitutional law — supremacy of the Constitution; separation of powers; Parliament’s powers to appoint committees (Art.90) — committees’ High Court-like powers and subject to judicial review; Right to fair hearing and natural justice (Art.28) — non-derogable; Vacation of office for Prime Minister and Ministers governed by Articles 108A and 116 — Parliament cannot order "stepping aside"; Parliamentary decorum and privileges — debate may be intemperate but does not necessarily invalidate committee formation.
20 February 2012