Constitutional Court of Uganda - 2010

4 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
4 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
October 2010
The court ruled that post-judgment actions adding a party to a consent judgment violated constitutional rights.
Constitutional Law – Consent Judgment – Addition of Parties Post Judgment – Articles 26 and 28 of the Constitution – Judicial Authority – Functus Officio Doctrine – Property Rights.
18 October 2010
August 2010
Sedition provisions were struck down as unconstitutional overbroad limits on freedom of expression; sectarianism provision upheld.
Constitutional law – Freedom of expression (Art 29(1)(a)) – Limitations (Art 43) – Sedition provisions (ss.39–40 Penal Code) overbroad and vague – burden on State to prove restrictions acceptable and demonstrably justifiable – sections 42–44 redundant; promoting sectarianism (s.41) upheld.
25 August 2010
May 2010

 

14 May 2010
February 2010
Review based on a late, unverified letter failed where authenticity, provenance and due diligence requirements under Order 46 r.3(2) were not met.
• Civil procedure — review of judgment — reliance on purportedly newly discovered documentary evidence — strict test under Order 46 r.3(2) CPR. • Evidence — authenticity and provenance of documents — necessity of affidavits and timely production. • Civil procedure — duty to use discovery (Order 10 r.12) and due diligence before seeking review. • Delay — late surfacing of evidence (five years after decree) may defeat review application.
11 February 2010