|
Review based on a late, unverified letter failed where authenticity, provenance and due diligence requirements under Order 46 r.3(2) were not met.
• Civil procedure — review of judgment — reliance on purportedly newly discovered documentary evidence — strict test under Order 46 r.3(2) CPR.
• Evidence — authenticity and provenance of documents — necessity of affidavits and timely production.
• Civil procedure — duty to use discovery (Order 10 r.12) and due diligence before seeking review.
• Delay — late surfacing of evidence (five years after decree) may defeat review application.
|