Results.
4,310 judgments found.
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
October 2025
Appellate court upheld a 20-year sentence for aggravated defilement of a nine-year-old as not excessive.
Criminal law — Aggravated defilement — sentence assessment and appellate interference; consideration of mitigating and aggravating factors (victim age, breach of trust)
Sentencing — application of 2013 Sentencing Guidelines (range for aggravated defilement) and parity with jurisprudence. Appellate review — re-appraisal of evidence with deference to trial court's advantage in observing witnesses
3 October 2025
Appellate court set aside an inadequately reasoned 25-year manslaughter sentence and resentenced to 18 years with remand deduction.
Criminal law — Sentencing — Manslaughter — Whether sentence manifestly excessive — Requirement to demonstrate application of aggravating and mitigating factors — Sentencing Guidelines (15-year starting point) — Deduction of pre-trial remand.
3 October 2025
Appellate court reduced aggravated defilement sentence to 17.5 years, requiring explicit arithmetic remand credit under Article 23(8).
Criminal law — Sentencing — Aggravated defilement — Appropriate sentence having regard to gravity, incestuous element and victim's age
Constitution Art. 23(8) — Remand credit — remand period must be arithmetically credited; general statements are ambiguous
Appeal — interference with sentence only where illegal, erroneous in principle or manifestly excessive
3 October 2025
Court reduced a 35‑year aggravated defilement sentence to 27 years after considering consistency and remand deductions.
Criminal law — Sentencing — appellate interference only where sentence illegal, wrong principle, material factor overlooked, or manifestly excessive
Sentencing — Aggravated defilement — seriousness, victim’s age, breach of trust and physical injury as aggravating factors. Sentencing guidelines — duty to consider consistency with comparable cases. Appellate powers — Court of Appeal may substitute sentence and deduct pre‑trial remand under Judicature Act
3 October 2025
A voluntary, retracted confession corroborated direct evidence; appeal against conviction for defilement dismissed.
Criminal law — aggravated defilement; admissibility and corroboration of retracted confession; hearsay vs direct report evidence; victim non‑attendance; procedural safeguards when recording charge and caution statements.
3 October 2025
Appellate court reduced a manifestly excessive murder sentence to align with comparable precedents and allowed remand credit.
Criminal law — Murder — Appeal against sentence — Appellate interference only where sentencing was wrong in principle or manifestly excessive
Sentencing — Consistency with comparable cases — appellate court may reduce sentence if out of range. Remand credit — time on remand deducted from substituted sentence
3 October 2025
Appellate court upheld murder sentence, finding the trial judge properly balanced aggravating/mitigating factors and deducted remand.
Criminal law — Sentencing — Appellate interference — discretion to interfere only if sentence is illegal, founded on wrong principle, manifestly excessive or material facts ignored
Sentencing
— consideration of aggravating and mitigating factors and setting a starting point
— deduction of remand period under Article 23(8) of the Constitution and Sentencing Guidelines. Appellate procedure — first appellate court power to re‑appraise evidence (Rule 30(1)) and exercise same sentencing powers as trial court (Section 11 Judicature Act)
3 October 2025
Where sentence was imposed before Rwabugande, failure to arithmetically deduct remand did not render it illegal; 18-year rape sentence upheld.
Criminal law — Rape — sentencing — requirement to deduct pre-trial remand under Article 23(8) — effect of Rwabugande decision on sentences imposed prior to that authority. Appellate review — interference with sentencing discretion — manifest excessiveness standard and consistency with comparable precedents
Retroactivity — non-retroactive application of new sentencing requirement where sentence was passed before the leading decision
3 October 2025
Appellate court reduced life sentence to 31 years 6 months for failure to consider material mitigating factors.
Criminal law — Sentencing — Interference by appellate court where sentence illegal, based on wrong principle, overlooks material factors, or is manifestly excessive
Sentencing — Mitigation — youth, first offender status, breadwinner role, and time on remand relevant and must be considered. Appellate powers — Court of Appeal may exercise original sentencing jurisdiction under s.11 Judicature Act to substitute an appropriate sentence. Sentencing consistency — courts must have regard to sentencing guidelines and comparable authorities
3 October 2025
September 2025
Stay application dismissed for being brought in Court of Appeal instead of first in the High Court.
Civil procedure — stay of execution/injunction pending appeal — Rule 42(1) requirement to apply first in the High Court — limited exception in Rule 42(2) for intending appellants — Court of Appeal may only hear in first instance where special circumstances or imminent delay shown — application dismissed on preliminary objection; merits not considered.
30 September 2025
Appellate court upheld the aggravated defilement sentence and compensation for permanent injury to the victim.
Criminal law — Aggravated defilement — sentence — appellate interference with sentence only where wrong principle, overlooked material factor, or manifest excess
Sentencing — mitigating versus aggravating factors — permanent physical injury to a child as a substantial aggravation
Trial on Indictments Act — compensation for material loss or personal injury — award permissible where severe personal injury is evident even without detailed pecuniary evidence. Sentencing guidelines and comparative precedents are informative but not binding; sentences must reflect each case’s facts
29 September 2025
Whether a 30-year murder sentence was manifestly excessive under sentencing guidelines and consistency principles.
Criminal law — Sentencing — Murder — Whether a 30-year sentence is manifestly excessive — Application of the Constitution (Sentencing Guidelines, 2013) — Principle of consistency/uniformity in sentencing — Scope of appellate interference on sentence.
29 September 2025
Failure to deduct remand time rendered the sentence illegal; appellate court set aside and re-sentenced accordingly.
Criminal law — Aggravated defilement — Sentencing — Mandatory deduction of remand time under Article 23(8) of the Constitution and Principle 15 of Sentencing Guidelines — Failure to deduct renders sentence illegal — Appellate re-sentencing under Section 11 Judicature Act.
29 September 2025
Appeal against life sentence for aggravated defilement dismissed; sentence upheld as not manifestly excessive.
Criminal law — Sentencing — Appeal against sentence — aggravated defilement of a 2‑year‑old — consideration and weighing of aggravating and mitigating factors under the Constitution (Sentencing Guidelines) (Practice Directions) 2013; appellate restraint in interfering with sentencing discretion; consistency in sentencing for serious child sexual offences.
29 September 2025
Failure to arithmetically deduct pre-trial remand rendered a sentence illegal; appellate court resentenced accordingly.
Criminal law — Sentencing — Aggravated defilement — Mandatory deduction of pre-trial remand (Article 23(8); Guideline 15) — Reconciliation not available for felonies — Appellate resentencing powers (Judicature Act s.11).
29 September 2025
Second appeal struck out for dilatory prosecution—failure to file conferencing notes and take essential steps; costs to respondents.
Civil procedure — Appeal — Striking out for want of prosecution/dilatory conduct; mandatory filing of conferencing notes and attendance at scheduling; misuse of stay of execution to retain possession; second appeal limited to appraisal of inferences of fact (no fresh evidence).
26 September 2025
Declaratory trespass suit to preserve an estate was not barred by res judicata or limitation; transfers found irregular and appellants trespassers.
Property law; succession and administration of estates — preservation of estate rights — declaratory relief and injunctions; Res judicata — applicability where earlier proceedings involved different parties and different reliefs; Limitation — declaratory suits and continuing trespass fall outside 12-year recovery bar; Fraudulent/irregular land registration — constructive fraud on successors in administration; Possession and trespass — evidence of occupation versus sales/subdivisions by successors.
26 September 2025
Appellate court upheld a 30-year rape sentence, finding it proportionate given severe aggravating factors.
Criminal law — Rape — Sentencing — Appellate interference only where trial court misdirected or imposed manifestly excessive sentence — Consistency in sentencing not absolute — Aggravating factors (violence, threats, multiple assaults, HIV exposure) justify severe term — Validation of out-of-time Notice of Appeal.
26 September 2025
A consent judgment recorded in court is binding and may only be set aside for limited reasons; drafting errors may be corrected.
Civil procedure — Consent judgments — Validity of oral consent recorded in court — Consent judgment binding despite absence of formal signed draft; grounds to set aside limited to fraud, collusion, illegality, mistake or misapprehension; appellate correction/variation of decree to reflect recorded consent.
26 September 2025
Appeal dismissed for procedural delay; respondent's title and compensation largely upheld, general damages reduced.
Civil procedure — appeal competence — failure to lodge memorandum/record within 60 days under Rule 83(1) — appeal deemed withdrawn; Limitation law — accrual of cause of action in land claims (2016/2018) — suit within statutory period; Land law — validity of title — customary root of title and statutory conversion to freehold; Registration of Titles Act — earlier title defeasible where it wrongly includes another’s land; Compensation — reliance on unchallenged valuation; General damages — appellate reduction for excessiveness; Interest — discretionary award upheld at 23% p.a.
19 September 2025
First appellate court upholds invalidity of will, unlawful probate and fraudulent title; appeal dismissed, costs to respondent.
Wills and succession — admissibility and execution — compliance with Succession Act formalities and Illiterates Protection Act (jurat) — burden of proof under Evidence Act s.101; Probate — grant only to executor appointed by will (express or necessary implication) — invalid will negates probate; Registration and title — registration procured by forged/invalid instrument may amount to fraud; Pleadings and procedure — appeal ground not based on trial judgment is incompetent; Damages — general damages for distress justified by finding of fraud.
19 September 2025
The applicant cannot be held liable as successor absent proof it assumed the predecessor's tortious liabilities.
Civil procedure — wrong party/who may be sued — successor liability — proof required to establish assumption of tortious liabilities; Res judicata — scope of prior Supreme Court ruling; Damages — special damages must be pleaded/ascertained; Interest — award from filing date only for ascertained debts; appropriateness of high commercial interest rates for unascertained damages.
19 September 2025
Application for stay dismissed for non-compliance with Rule 42(1) and failure to show exceptional circumstances.
Court of Appeal practice — Rule 42(1) Court of Appeal Rules — requirement to apply to High Court first for stay; special/exceptional circumstances threshold; stay of self-executing declaratory orders; competence to join parties on appeal; affidavits by persons with knowledge under Rule 44(1).
18 September 2025
An Article 50 motion cannot substitute for a full trial to resolve disputed land ownership and prove special damages.
Constitutional enforcement (Article 50) — Procedure: Notice of motion and affidavit evidence vs ordinary suit by plaint where ownership/fraud are substantially disputed; Judicial notice — statutory instrument (Gazette/General Notice) and its evidential effect; Evidence — pleading and proof of special damages, valuation reports and requirement of full trial; Article 126(2)(e) — limits on dispensing with procedural requirements; Remedies — cancellation of title, compensation and mesne profits not appropriately awarded on motion evidence.
17 September 2025
Employer failed to prove desertion; employee entitled to salary arrears, retirement benefits and reduced damages.
Employment law — unlawful removal from payroll — desertion — burden of proof on employer to show transfer, notice and intent not to return; entitlement to salary arrears and retirement benefits
Damages — general damages for non-pecuniary loss upheld; punitive damages not justified and set aside
Interest — pre-judgment interest discretionary (20% upheld for arrears to judgment); post-judgment interest substituted at 6% until payment
17 September 2025
Whether agreements were sales or unlicensed loans and whether resulting agreements were enforceable.
Commercial law — characterisation of transactions as sale of goods versus loan agreements; Money-lending — unlicensed money lending renders loan agreements unenforceable; Subsequent agreements arising from illegal contracts inherit unenforceability; Proper temporal application of statutes — cannot apply post-enactment law to earlier transactions; Remedies — courts will not grant damages flowing from contracts tainted by illegality.
17 September 2025
A party must raise bona fide triable issues to obtain leave to defend a summary suit under a contractual dispute.
Summary procedure — leave to appear and defend — whether triable issues or bona fide defences were raised — contract law — consideration for penalties and interest — enforceability of contractual penalties and interest rates — unconscionability — specific performance — contractual contingencies — appellate review of summary judgment.
11 September 2025
The absence of a written judgment requires the appellate court to re-evaluate evidence and substitute its own verdict and sentence.
Criminal procedure — fair trial — absence of written judgment — powers of appellate court — re-evaluation of evidence — murder — aggravated robbery — circumstantial evidence — doctrine of recent possession — acquittal for lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
11 September 2025
Appellate court reduced a 50-year murder sentence to 27 years 9 months after mitigating factors were ignored.
Criminal law — Sentencing — appellate interference where sentence is manifestly excessive; mitigating factors (first offender, remand) must be considered — mob justice vs premeditation in sentencing — substitution of sentence under section 11 Judicature Act — deduction for time on remand (Article 23(8)).
9 September 2025
A self-represented appellant's claim to family land failed for lack of legal entitlement, despite procedural errors and a timely suit.
Land law — Customary tenure — Claim to land as a beneficiary or by adverse possession — Limitation of actions — Effect of failure to visit locus in quo — Standards for framing grounds of appeal.
5 September 2025
An appellate court may reduce a manifestly excessive life sentence where mitigating factors were overlooked and substitute a fixed term.
Criminal law — Sentencing — Appellate re-appraisal of sentence where trial judge overlooked mitigating factors — Life imprisonment substituted with fixed term for consistency — Deduction of remand period.
4 September 2025
A 21-year sentence for aggravated robbery was upheld as neither harsh nor excessive given the offence’s gravity and prevailing sentencing standards.
Criminal law — Sentencing — Aggravated robbery — Principles for appellate review of sentence — Discretion of sentencing court — Consideration of aggravating and mitigating factors — Consistency with sentencing guidelines and precedents.
3 September 2025
Court upheld a 43-year sentence for murder, finding it within guidelines and not manifestly excessive given aggravating circumstances.
Criminal law — sentencing — murder — appellate review of sentence — whether 43-year sentence for murder was manifestly harsh and excessive — sentencing guidelines for murder — discretion of trial court — aggravating and mitigating factors — lack of remorse.
3 September 2025
The Court of Appeal set aside an illegal 40-year sentence for murder, imposing 30 years less time served on remand.
Criminal law — sentencing — murder — consideration of time spent on remand — guidelines for sentencing in cases of mob justice — application of mitigating and aggravating factors — appellate court’s power to review illegal sentences.
3 September 2025
An appeal was struck out for failure to obtain the mandatory leave before appealing a dismissal of a review application.
Civil procedure — right of appeal — appealability of orders — requirement for leave to appeal when review is refused — compliance with procedural steps and time limits — incapacity of non-existent party — appeals and procedural technicalities.
3 September 2025
The appellate court upheld a 25-year sentence for murder, finding it was neither harsh nor excessive given established guidelines.
Criminal law — Sentencing — Murder — Appellate review of sentence — Principles for appellate interference — Whether 25-year sentence for murder is manifestly harsh or excessive — Sentencing consistency with precedents and guidelines.
3 September 2025
Court of Appeal declined to grant mandatory and temporary injunctions, finding no irreparable harm or balance of convenience favoring applicants.
Civil procedure — application for injunctions pending appeal — requirements for mandatory and temporary injunctions — whether High Court's refusal of injunction justified — discretionary powers of appellate court in interlocutory relief — effect of registration and possession in interlocutory applications.
3 September 2025
A sentence imposed outside a plea bargain agreement and without deducting remand time is unlawful and must be corrected.
Criminal procedure — sentencing — plea bargain agreement — trial court departing from plea bargain — legality of sentence — deduction of remand period — appellate power to correct illegal sentence.
3 September 2025
A sentence for aggravated defilement upheld where the trial judge’s discretion was properly exercised and the sentence was not excessive.
Criminal law — aggravated defilement — sentencing discretion — appellate interference — sentence within prescribed range — sentencing guidelines — principle of non-interference with trial court discretion unless sentence is manifestly excessive or illegal.
3 September 2025
Appeal against sentence for aggravated defilement dismissed; trial judge’s sentencing discretion found properly exercised.
Criminal law — Sentencing — Aggravated defilement — appellate review of sentence — discretion of sentencing judge — manifestly excessive test — consistency with sentencing guidelines and precedents.
3 September 2025
Failure to consider mitigating factors in sentencing did not render a 19-year sentence for aggravated defilement harsh or excessive.
Criminal law — aggravated defilement — sentencing — mitigating and aggravating factors — discretion of sentencing judge — appellate intervention where sentence manifestly excessive or miscarriage of justice occurs.
3 September 2025
Appellate court declined to reduce a murder sentence where the trial judge had properly balanced aggravating and mitigating factors.
Criminal law — sentencing — murder — appellate review of sentence — principles for interference with trial court’s sentencing discretion — aggravating and mitigating factors — sentence not manifestly excessive.
2 September 2025
Failure to deduct time spent on remand from a sentence renders it illegal and warrants resentencing by an appellate court.
Criminal law — Sentencing — Aggravated defilement — Consideration of time spent on remand — Article 23(8) of the Constitution — Illegality of sentence where remand period not deducted — Appellate powers to resentence.
2 September 2025
Sentences for murder and aggravated robbery upheld where omission to consider first offender status caused no miscarriage of justice.
Criminal law — Sentencing — Consideration of mitigating and aggravating factors — Whether omission to consider first offender status warrants interference — Sentences for murder and aggravated robbery — Exercise of sentencing discretion — Appellate review of sentence.
2 September 2025
A 26-year sentence for aggravated defilement was upheld as appropriate, consistent and not manifestly excessive given the case facts.
Criminal law — sentencing — aggravated defilement — appellate review of sentence — discretion and consistency in sentencing — principles for interference on appeal — sentencing of first offenders — consideration of aggravating and mitigating factors — sentencing guidelines for aggravated defilement.
2 September 2025
A murder sentence was reduced after the trial court failed to consider the appellant’s first offender status and other mitigation.
Criminal law — Sentencing — Murder — Whether sentence manifestly harsh or excessive — Failure to consider mitigating factors — First offender status — Appellate interference with sentence.
2 September 2025
Appellate court upheld a 27-year sentence for aggravated defilement, finding the sentence consistent, proportionate, and not manifestly excessive.
Criminal law — aggravated defilement — sentencing — discretion of trial judge — mitigating and aggravating factors — relevance of remorsefulness — appellate interference — sentencing guidelines — consistency and proportionality in sentencing.
2 September 2025
Adverse possession extinguishes competing registered leasehold and entitles the possessor to registration despite prior title claims.
Land law — registration of title — bona fide purchaser for value without notice — adverse possession — effect of Limitation Act on title recovery — application of nemo dat quod non habet in Torrens system — role of estoppel — proof and pleading of fraud.
1 September 2025
August 2025
A stay of execution to prevent exhumation for DNA testing was denied as the applicant failed to show likelihood of appeal success or irreparable harm.
Civil procedure — stay of execution — requirements for grant — estate administration — DNA testing for paternity — exhumation — locus standi — irreparable harm — balance of convenience — judicial estoppel.
29 August 2025
Fixed-term contractual employees are not entitled to terminal benefits or permanent employment status absent clear contractual or statutory basis.
Labour Law — fixed-term contracts — continuous employment — permanent employment status — entitlement to terminal benefits and pension — interpretation of contractual terms — freedom of contract — unlawful termination — discrimination in employment.
29 August 2025
