|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| February 2026 |
|
|
Appellate court upheld a 24-year sentence for aggravated defilement, finding no manifest excess and proper consideration of remand and mitigation.
Sentencing — aggravated defilement — appellate interference with sentence — manifestly excessive test — mitigation and aggravating factors — credit for remand — Sentencing Guidelines starting point.
|
27 February 2026 |
|
Aggravated robbery conviction upheld; identification and theft proved, sentence reduced for remand credit, compensation affirmed.
Criminal law – Aggravated robbery – proof of theft without recovery of property; identification evidence and alibi; sentencing – mandatory remand credit (Article 23(8)) and re‑sentencing; compensation under Penal Code/Trial on Indictments Act.
|
27 February 2026 |
|
Appeal contesting plea-bargain procedure and language comprehension dismissed; conviction and 25-year sentence affirmed.
Criminal law – Plea bargain – Plea-taking procedure – Language of accused – Rule 12 Judicature (Plea Bargain) Rules 2016 – Interpreter signature – Section 139 Trial on Indictments Act – Miscarriage of justice.
|
27 February 2026 |
|
Appeal dismissed: appellant breached an oral land sale; transfer documents showed surrender, and damages award was affirmed after reassessment.
Land law – sale of land and oral agreements – transfer form and undertaking – surrender vs sale – bona fide purchaser for value without notice – breach of sale agreement – assessment of general damages – appellate power to reassess damages.
|
26 February 2026 |
|
Long, continuous unchallenged occupation defeats a nearly fifty-year-late proprietary claim; appeal dismissed, High Court upheld.
Land law — Possession and bona fide occupancy — Long, continuous and unchallenged occupation may defeat a delayed proprietary claim; trespass, abandonment and limitation — appellate competence to decide issues central to substantive justice even if not precisely pleaded.
|
25 February 2026 |
|
Interlocutory Court of Appeal orders do not automatically attract Supreme Court appeal; stay denied for lack of prima facie right and proof.
Civil procedure — Stay of execution pending appeal — Applicant must show prima facie right or likelihood of success or irreparable harm — Appellate jurisdiction statutory — No appeal as of right from interlocutory Court of Appeal orders to Supreme Court — Requirement to serve Notice of Appeal and record — Discretion on security for due performance.
|
25 February 2026 |
|
Dispute arose before Land Act 1998; gazetted township status defeats unrecognized customary occupation, appeal dismissed with costs.
Land law — applicability of Land Act 1998 to disputes arising before its commencement; proof of customary tenure — requirement of documentary/official recognition or admissible expert evidence where land is gazetted urban/public land; gazettement and survey evidence as determinative of township status; competence of second appeals — grounds must be points of law, not mixed law and fact.
|
23 February 2026 |
|
Execution and sale irregularities vitiated the transfer; appellant was not a bona fide purchaser and appeal is dismissed.
Civil procedure — Review of judgment — Duty of court to examine legality of execution and sale — Irregularities (no advertisement, over-attachment, failure to deposit sale proceeds, misrepresentation, transfer despite caveat) vitiate sale and transfer — Bona fide purchaser doctrine — Due diligence and notice — Appellate interference with exercise of judicial discretion.
|
23 February 2026 |
|
Court reduced aggravated defilement sentence after finding remand period was not arithmetically credited.
Criminal law — aggravated defilement — plea of guilty — role of assessors at sentencing — section 139 Trial on Indictment Act (failure of justice standard) — remand credit must be arithmetically deducted (Rwabugande principle) — Court of Appeal power to quash and resentence under Judicature Act.
|
22 February 2026 |
|
Conviction for aggravated defilement upheld; sentence reduced from ~33 years to 26 years (24 years 11 months after remand deduction).
Criminal law – aggravated defilement – appellate re-evaluation of evidence – assessors unsworn: procedural irregularity not necessarily a nullity absent miscarriage of justice – sentence review and reduction for excessiveness; exercise of section 11 Judicature Act powers.
|
19 February 2026 |
|
Second appeals are limited to pure points of law; amendments cannot be used to convert mixed law-and-fact grounds into law-only grounds.
Civil Procedure Act ss.72, 74 – Second appeals limited to points of law – Mixed law and fact grounds impermissible; Court of Appeal Rules r.45 – discretion to amend pleadings cannot override substantive statutory bar – amendment refused – application dismissed with costs.
|
19 February 2026 |
|
Appellants last seen with the deceased; cumulative circumstantial evidence upheld, alibi rejected, conviction and 35-year sentence affirmed.
Criminal law – Murder – Circumstantial evidence and the "last seen" doctrine – Evaluation of contradictory witness statements – Alibi raised late – Sentencing discretion and proportionality.
|
18 February 2026 |
|
Appellant's aggravated robbery conviction upheld on a complete chain of circumstantial and identifying evidence.
Criminal law – Aggravated robbery – Participation – Circumstantial evidence and single-witness identification – Doctrine of last seen – Admissibility/weight of untendered call/data record – Appellate re-evaluation.
|
18 February 2026 |
|
Mortgage deed held valid despite form deviations; private treaty sale upheld and trial award of UGX 91,915,000 set aside.
Property law – mortgage validity – deviations from prescribed form not fatal where substantive requirements satisfied and instrument witnessed; Sale of mortgaged land – private treaty permitted where mortgage deed authorises it and mortgagor consented; Bona fide purchaser – cross-appeal affecting purchaser struck out where notice of cross-appeal not shown to have been served; Damages – no recovery of asserted difference to open-market value where forced-sale context and valuation evidence do not support award.
|
13 February 2026 |
|
The applicant’s appeal is dismissed because the memorandum of appeal breached Rule 86(1) by stating vague, argumentative grounds and is therefore non-viable.
Second appeal — role of second appellate court under Rule 32(2) and s.72 CPA; Civil Procedure — Rule 83 (institution of appeals and service of application for proceedings); Civil Procedure — Rule 86(1) (contents of memorandum of appeal; requirement to state specific grounds); Evidence — appraisal of inconsistencies and possession in land disputes; Property law — characterization of transaction as mortgage versus sale and principles on clog on redemption.
|
12 February 2026 |
|
Application for stay pending appeal dismissed for procedural defects, lack of capacity, and failure to show irreparable harm.
Civil procedure — Stay of execution pending appeal — Rule 6(2)(b) and Rule 42(1)/(2) Court of Appeal Rules — Jurisdictional/competency requirements — Locus/standing — Judicial review (prerogative) orders not generally executable — Conditions for stay: prima facie success, irreparable harm, balance of convenience, security — Clean hands doctrine — Independent administrative action (IGG) and freezing of accounts.
|
12 February 2026 |
|
Leave to amend was refused due to inordinate delay and prejudice, though the amendment did not introduce a new cause of action.
Civil procedure — Amendment of pleadings (Order 6 Rule 19) — Leave to amend to be freely granted unless it introduces a distinct new cause of action, is malafide, causes undue prejudice, or is barred by law — Inordinate delay and prejudice as valid grounds to refuse amendment — Statutory notice not mandatory in these circumstances — Appellate review of discretionary exercise limited to misdirection or manifestly wrong exercise of discretion.
|
12 February 2026 |
|
Trial court erred in dismissing the applicant’s land claim for lack of locus standi; appeal allowed and matter remitted.
Civil procedure – locus standi in land disputes – distinction between locus standi and cause of action – requirement (or not) of letters of administration for a beneficiary to sue – appellate procedure – service and timing of applications for leave to appeal out of time – competence objections under Court of Appeal Rules (Rules 82, 102) – remittal for hearing on merits.
|
12 February 2026 |
|
Court stayed execution pending appeal, holding the decision was appealable as of right and applicants met stay requirements.
Court of Appeal – Stay of execution pending appeal – Appeal as of right where decision conclusively determines rights – Requirements for stay: arguable appeal/likelihood of success, irreparable harm/nugatory outcome, balance of convenience, promptness of application – Execution/taxation proceedings and risk of civil imprisonment.
|
12 February 2026 |
|
Court set aside an erroneous severance and allocation, restoring joint tenancy and equal sharing of proceeds and liabilities.
Land law – Joint tenancy – Severance – Four unities (possession, interest, title, time) – Modes of severance; Procedural law – Use of Notice of Motion/Human Rights (Enforcement) Act for contested property severance; Constitutional law – Protection of property (Article 26) and limits on deprivation; Relief – Registration changes, injunctions, partition principles and equitable shares.
|
12 February 2026 |
|
Second appeal dismissed: purchase proved; alleged clan title and gift unproven, eviction and permanent injunction ordered.
Civil procedure – Second appeal limited to questions of law; appellate re-evaluation of evidence. Land law – proof of purchase versus clan/ancestral land; requirements for valid gift inter vivos
Evidence – admissibility of electronic recordings; necessity of locus in quo visit when ownership central
|
12 February 2026 |
|
The appellate court wrongly overturned the trial’s land ownership finding by misassessing the applicant's witnesses and disregarding the locus visit.
Land law – ownership by inheritance – weight of locus in quo and witness demeanour – appellate re-appraisal of evidence on second appeal under s.72 Civil Procedure Act – adverse possession not established.
|
11 February 2026 |
|
Circumstantial evidence failed to prove participation in murder; procedural omissions not fatal without miscarriage of justice.
Criminal law – murder – circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain excluding every reasonable hypothesis of innocence; procedural irregularities (unsworn assessors, lack of recorded summing-up, failure to record witness oaths) do not automatically vitiate trial unless miscarriage of justice shown – appellate reappraisal and discretion on retrial.
|
11 February 2026 |
|
Allowing an amended plaint that substitutes a new cause of action to evade limitation is irregular; suit was time-barred.
Civil procedure — Amendment of pleadings — Order 5 r.19 CPR — Amendment that substitutes a distinct cause of action is irregular — Limitation — Section 5 Limitation Act — Recovery of land — Continuous trespass principle inapplicable where amended plaint unlawfully admitted.
|
11 February 2026 |
|
Whether a 25-year sentence for aggravated defilement on a guilty plea was manifestly harsh and excessive.
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – Sentencing – Effect of guilty plea and mitigating/aggravating factors – Appellate intervention only where sentence is manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.
|
10 February 2026 |
|
Appellate court upheld a 26-year sentence for aggravated defilement, finding it not excessive given the aggravating factors.
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – Sentencing principles – Plea of guilty as mitigation – Appellate interference only where sentence illegal, wrong in principle or manifestly excessive – Sentencing precedents and guidelines.
|
10 February 2026 |
|
Appeal against a 23 years 6 months murder sentence dismissed; trial judge properly balanced mitigating and aggravating factors.
Criminal law – Murder – Sentence appeal – Scope of appellate review – Sentencing Guidelines and consistency – Mitigating (remand period, youth) and aggravating (gruesome killing) factors – 23 years 6 months not manifestly excessive.
|
10 February 2026 |
|
Convictions quashed due to irretrievable loss of trial record; retrial ordered, appellants may apply for bail.
Missing record of proceedings — duty of trial court/registrar to prepare and transmit record — right to appeal and fair hearing — remedy for lost records: retrial versus acquittal — factors: possibility of reconstruction, gravity of offence, time served, prejudice to accused and victims.
|
10 February 2026 |
|
The appellant’s conviction and adult sentence were quashed because he was a juvenile when the offences occurred.
Criminal law – juvenile offenders – age determination and medical evidence – detention and remand of juveniles – remit to Family and Children Court for sentencing under the Children Act – conviction and sentence quashed for procedural breaches and miscarriage of justice.
|
10 February 2026 |
