|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| December 2025 |
|
|
Appeal allowed: respondent not a bona fide occupant, caveat invalid, eviction ordered, costs to appellant.
Land law – bona fide occupant under s.29(2) Land Act – requirements of 12 years unchallenged occupation before 1995 Constitution; capacity to contract – non‑entity parish lacks authority to grant land; caveatable interest – necessity of legal or equitable interest to lodge caveat; appellate review – misquotation/extraneous matter and re‑evaluation of evidence; appeal procedure – Rule 86(1) specificity requirement for grounds of appeal.
|
22 December 2025 |
|
Failure to deduct remand time made the sentence illegal; court deducted one year, fixing a 15-year term.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Deduction of remand time – Failure to deduct remand period renders sentence illegal – Appellate re-sentencing under section 11 Judicature Act – Aggravated defilement and HIV infection.
|
17 December 2025 |
|
Appellate court dismissed challenge to a 16‑year sentence for aggravated defilement, finding it not manifestly excessive.
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – Sentencing – Appellate interference with sentence – leave to appeal against sentence – consideration of mitigating and aggravating factors (age, first offender, time on remand; HIV status, school dropout, pregnancies) – sentencing guidelines and consistency.
|
17 December 2025 |
|
Appeal against sentence dismissed: allocutus and remand credit were considered and the 27 years 8 months term was not excessive.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Appellate interference with sentencing discretion; Allocutus (pre-sentencing hearing); Article 23(8) Constitution – credit for time spent on remand; Sentencing Guidelines – starting points and comparative authorities for murder.
|
17 December 2025 |
|
Appellate court reduced a manifestly excessive murder sentence and resentenced the appellant after deducting remand time.
Criminal law – Murder – Sentencing – Whether sentence manifestly excessive – Appellate reappraisal and interference with sentencing discretion – Section 11 Judicature Act power to resentence – Deduction of remand period – Sentencing Guidelines starting point 35 years.
|
17 December 2025 |
|
Whether a 35‑year sentence for aggravated defilement by an HIV‑positive first offender was excessive given mitigating factors.
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – Sentencing – appellate interference with sentence – failure to consider mitigating factors – HIV status as aggravating factor – consistency in sentencing – deduction of remand period.
|
17 December 2025 |
|
Remand period need not be arithmetically deducted if sentencing judge clearly credits it; 16-year sentence confirmed.
Criminal law - aggravated defilement; sentencing - remand credit under Article 23(8) Constitution; plea bargaining; arithmetic deduction of remand time not strictly required where court shows credit; appellate review of sentence.
|
17 December 2025 |
|
A bank’s promise to issue letters of credit was actionable; respondent awarded demurrage, LC fees and USD 53,313.90 for withheld contract funds.
Banking law – Letters of credit – Representation and estoppel – Whether email promising irrevocable sight LC created actionable obligation; Contract and fiduciary duties – breach for failing to honour LC representation; Damages – assessment and appellate interference; Proof of outstanding loan – requirement of credible loan statement; Cross‑appeal – recovery for sums recalled/withheld by employer due to sale of goods.
|
17 December 2025 |
|
Appeal against a 30‑year murder sentence dismissed; sentence found not manifestly excessive and thus maintained.
Criminal law – Murder – Sentence – appellate review of sentencing discretion – manifestly excessive – mitigating factors (age, first offender) – consistency with precedents – remand deduction.
|
17 December 2025 |
|
Failure to deduct remand custody renders sentence illegal; court re-sentenced and deducted two years, effective 28 years.
Criminal law — Murder by poisoning; Sentencing — obligation to deduct period spent on remand (Article 23(8) Constitution); Failure to deduct renders sentence illegal; Court of Appeal re-sentencing powers under s.11 Judicature Act; Sentencing consistency and range for single-victim murder (20–35 years).
|
17 December 2025 |
|
Whether a sentencing court must arithmetically deduct pre-trial remand time where the controlling precedent postdates the sentence.
Criminal law – sentencing – murder, attempted murder, attempted suicide; credit for pre-trial remand; non-retrospectivity of Rwabugande arithmetic deduction; appellate interference standard.
|
17 December 2025 |
|
Failure to expressly credit remand time renders a sentence illegal; appellate court may resentence and apply deduction.
Criminal law – Murder arising from mob justice; Sentence – constitutional requirement to credit remand time (Art. 23(8)); Trial judge must apply remand deduction expressly; Appellate power to resentence under s.11 Judicature Act; Relevant authorities: Rwabugande, Abelle.
|
17 December 2025 |
|
Plea-bargain murder sentence upheld; remand period credited and appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – plea-bargain sentencing – remand credit under Article 23(8) – informal application for extension of time – appellate interference with plea-bargain sentences.
|
17 December 2025 |
|
Appellate court upheld a 20-year murder sentence as appropriate, stressing deterrence against brutal mob justice.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Murder resulting from mob justice – Sentencing Guidelines (35-year starting point; 30 years to death range) – Appellate interference only where sentence is manifestly excessive or wrong in principle – Remand period and mitigating factors considered – Deterrence of mob justice.
|
17 December 2025 |
|
The appellant's life sentence for murdering his wife was reduced as manifestly excessive and remand time was credited.
Criminal law – Murder – Sentencing – Whether sentence is manifestly excessive – Need to consider both aggravating and mitigating factors – Consistency in sentencing – Substitution of sentence under section 11 of the Judicature Act – Credit for time on remand.
|
17 December 2025 |
|
Appellate court set aside a harsher-than-agreed plea-bargain sentence and deducted remand time, imposing the agreed term.
Criminal law — Plea bargain — Court must not impose a sentence harsher than that agreed (Judicature (Plea Bargain) Rules r.15(2)) — If dissatisfied court must reject plea and order full trial; Sentencing — Deduction of remand custody mandatory (Art.23(8) Constitution) — Sentencing warrant must specify term and remand deduction.
|
17 December 2025 |
|
Appellants' aggravated robbery sentences upheld as within sentencing guidelines and not manifestly excessive.
Criminal law – Aggravated robbery – Sentencing – Manifestly excessive – Appellate reappraisal of sentence – Sentencing Guidelines – Common intention – Validation of out-of-time notice of appeal.
|
17 December 2025 |
|
Court set aside unclear sentence and re-sentenced aggravated defilement to 20 years, deducting three years remand (17 years to serve).
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – Sentencing – Deduction of pre-trial custody under Article 23(8) – Appellate interference where sentence unclear or excessive – Re-sentencing under s.11 Judicature Act – Parity and mitigating/aggravating factors.
|
17 December 2025 |
|
Pre-trial remand periods must be arithmetically credited to sentence; overlooked remand time reduced the term accordingly.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Pre-trial remand credit – Remand periods must be arithmetically deducted from sentence; appellate correction where trial court overlooked material remand period; limits on interference with sentencing discretion.
|
17 December 2025 |
|
Appellate court reduced sentence by one year to account for time spent on remand after prosecution conceded illegality.
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – Sentencing – Failure to deduct remand time renders sentence illegal – Appellate re-sentencing under section 11 Judicature Act – Appellate interference limited to illegal, excessive or improperly reasoned sentences.
|
17 December 2025 |
|
Appellate court reduced the appellant’s life sentence for murder, finding omission of mitigating factors and manifest excessiveness.
Criminal law – Murder – Sentencing – Appellate interference for manifestly excessive sentence – Failure to consider mitigating factors – Remand period deduction – Sentencing range for murder 18–35 years – Power to resentence under s.11 Judicature Act.
|
17 December 2025 |
|
Whether unpleaded fraud can justify title cancellation and whether respondents held lawful kibanja interests.
Land law – Kibanja/equitable interest – Lawful occupant under s.29(1)(b) of the Land Act; Pleading and proof of fraud – appellate courts cannot decide unpleaded fraud or make orders affecting non‑parties without hearing them; Second appeal – duty to reappraise evidence; Award of damages on appeal where counterclaim sought damages.
|
11 December 2025 |
|
A single Justice cannot grant a mandatory interlocutory injunction restoring the applicant to disputed land; application dismissed.
Civil procedure – interlocutory mandatory injunction – exceptional relief requiring high degree of assurance – restoration of possession pendente lite – status quo – jurisdiction of a single Justice versus full bench – appropriate remedy for alleged excessive execution is setting aside execution.
|
11 December 2025 |
|
Court set aside ex parte striking of appeal, restoring applicant's right to be heard due to counsel's negligence.
Civil procedure — Ex parte rulings — Rule 56(2) & (3) — Setting aside ex parte decisions — 'Sufficient cause' — Effect of counsel negligence on litigant's right to be heard — Service of process — Restoration of appeal for interparty hearing.
|
4 December 2025 |
|
An interlocutory application to set aside an ex parte ruling is moot once the underlying application has been finally determined.
Civil procedure – interlocutory application to set aside ex parte ruling – doctrine of mootness and functus officio – effect of final determination of underlying application – remedy by restoration – service of process disputes.
|
4 December 2025 |
|
Beneficiaries may sell allotted shares pre-grant; purchaser with part payment and possession had equitable title; registered title impeached for fraud; unpleaded monetary orders set aside.
Succession law – beneficiaries' capacity to deal with allotted shares pre-grant – equitable interest by part payment and possession; Land law – indefeasibility of title v fraud exception under RTA; bonafide purchaser without notice; procedural law – limits on granting unpleaded monetary reliefs and orders against deceased estate.
|
3 December 2025 |
|
A reviewing judge may correct patent errors apparent on the record but cannot award unpleaded general damages.
Civil procedure — Review jurisdiction — Error apparent on the face of the record — Distinction between review and appeal — Constructive trust and conflicting factual findings — Reliefs not pleaded — Award of general damages on review.
|
3 December 2025 |
|
Application for extension of time to appeal dismissed for failure to show sufficient cause; other reliefs lacked affidavit support.
Civil procedure — Extension of time to file appeal — Applicant must show sufficient reasons, no dilatory conduct and absence of injustice — Affidavit evidence required for interlocutory relief — Annexures unexplained have no probative value — Wrong citation of procedural rule a technicality not proving prejudice — Stay of execution and setting aside decree require evidential support and appropriate lower court procedure.
|
3 December 2025 |
|
Failure to serve the letter requesting the record nullified the late appeal; extension of time was refused.
Civil procedure — Appeal timelines — Service of letter requesting certified record of proceedings mandatory to suspend time under Rule 83(2) — Appeal filed out of time without leave is incompetent — Mistake of counsel not automatically sufficient for extension.
|
3 December 2025 |
|
Leave to adduce fresh evidence on appeal refused for lack of novelty, relevance, credibility and due diligence.
Appeal — application to adduce additional evidence under Rule 30 — requirements: newness/unavailability despite due diligence, relevance, credibility, probative value, promptness — counsel’s mistake insufficient to justify reopening — finality of litigation — dismissed where forgery complaint previously dismissed.
|
3 December 2025 |
|
Appeal dismissed for failure to exhaust internal remedies and for lodging the internal appeal out of time.
Administrative law – judicial review – exhaustion of internal remedies – employer’s HR manual appeal procedure – seven‑day appeal period – employment disputes not ordinarily amenable to judicial review.
|
3 December 2025 |
|
Struck-out evasive defence justified; fraud cannot be inferred without pleading and proof; eviction and damages upheld.
Civil procedure – striking out written statement of defence (O.6 r.30) for evasive denials; Pleadings – fraud must be specifically pleaded and strictly proved; Land law – tenant becoming trespasser after sale and notice to vacate; Damages – appellate restraint in disturbing discretionary awards.
|
2 December 2025 |
|
Appellants lacked locus and failed to prove fraud; registered owner's title and trespass finding affirmed.
Land law – registration and conclusive effect of title; locus standi of beneficiaries – letters of administration and power of attorney; trespass to land; fraud in procurement of title; validation of late appeal documents in interests of justice.
|
2 December 2025 |
|
Possession of title or occupation without a registered transfer does not create an equitable estate; appellants held trespassers.
Civil procedure — second appeal limited to points of law (s.72, s.74 CPA; Rule 86(1)) — Land law — trespass: elements (ownership, entry, lack of consent) — Equitable interest — requirement of legal source/transfer — Registered title requires registered transfer; possession of title document or occupation not conclusive.
|
2 December 2025 |
|
An unsigned plea bargain is void; appellate court may set aside sentence and resentence under section 11 of the Judicature Act.
Criminal law – murder – plea bargain – requirement that plea bargain confirmation be signed by presiding judicial officer – unsigned plea bargain void – trial judge’s reliance on unsigned agreement unlawful – appellate substitution of sentence under section 11 Judicature Act – mitigation and aggravation considered – remand credit.
|
1 December 2025 |
|
An unsigned plea bargain is void; sentencing based on it is unlawful, allowing appellate substitution of an appropriate sentence.
Criminal law – Plea bargaining – Plea bargain confirmation must be signed by presiding judicial officer (Rule 12(5)); unsigned plea bargain is void – Sentencing – appellate interference where sentence founded on void plea agreement – Section 11 Judicature Act powers to substitute sentence – mitigation and aggravation considered.
|
1 December 2025 |
| November 2025 |
|
|
Court granted temporary injunction preserving land status quo pending appeal, finding a triable issue and risk of irreparable harm.
Interlocutory injunction pending appeal; preservation of status quo; cause of action where High Court proceedings dismissed; American Cyanamid principles applied; risk of irreparable harm from resettlement of bibanja holders; appellate power to make consequential orders (Rule 32(1) and Rule 6(2)(b)).
|
24 November 2025 |
|
Whether long uninterrupted customary occupation amounted to a valid gift inter vivos conferring ownership.
Customary land law; gift inter vivos - elements and proof by long uninterrupted occupation; prescription and exclusive possession; judicial notice of public notoriety (LRA insurgency); limits of second appeal on questions of fact.
|
18 November 2025 |
|
Appellate court upheld title cancellation, found purchaser not a registered bona fide purchaser, and dismissed the appeal.
Land law – title cancellation – certificate of title susceptible to challenge where registration procured by fraud or inconsistent with deceased’s will; Bona fide purchaser doctrine – statutory protection under Registration of Titles Act available only to registered proprietors; Limitation Act – section 25 postpones limitation where action is based on fraud; Ancestral/Butaka land – customary evidence and wills can establish clan ownership; Damages – appellate restraint absent misapplication of principles.
|
18 November 2025 |
|
Appeal dismissed: Ugandan court had jurisdiction, service valid, ex parte trial proper, and evidence supported beneficial ownership declarations.
Civil procedure – service on foreign company carrying on business locally – Order 29 Rule 2 CPR and s.258 Companies Act; Jurisdiction – forum conveniens and cause of action arising locally; Ex parte proceedings – Order 9 Rule 25 and failure to comply with court directions; Beneficial ownership – evidence of trust, declarations and enforceability inter partes; Costs – follow the event.
|
18 November 2025 |
|
Appeal partly allowed because trial court relied on unpleaded customary law; grant of administration upheld under small‑estate exception.
Succession and estates – validity of letters of administration – application of section 2(5) Administration of Estates (Small Estates) (Special Provisions) Act – grant not revocable where beneficiaries not prejudiced. Civil procedure – pleadings – court must not decide on unpleaded grounds – trial judge erred in invoking customary law not pleaded by parties. Contracts – effect of minors signing as witnesses – minors witnessing does not per se invalidate a sale agreement. Evidence – appellate reappraisal of evidence and weighing of uncontradicted testimony regarding use of sale proceeds to purchase alternative land.
|
18 November 2025 |
|
Unsigned and unsealed written statement of defence was incurably defective; late appeal validated for COVID-19 reasons but appeal dismissed.
Civil procedure – filing of defence – Order 9 Rule 1(1) CPR – registrar’s signature and court seal required to authenticate filing; non-compliance incurable. Constitutional law – Article 126(2)(e) – does not permit disregard of mandatory procedural rules. Appeals – validation of late appeal documents – Rule 5; COVID-19 movement restrictions may constitute sufficient reason. Procedure – hearing in absence after defence struck out – not necessarily a nullity if party had notice or could have ascertained date. Case management – failure to take out summons for directions/scheduling conference not fatal on these facts.
|
18 November 2025 |
|
Court used the slip rule to correct currency, interest provisions, and typographical errors to reflect its original intention.
Civil procedure — Rule 36(1) (slip rule) — Correction of clerical or accidental errors to give effect to Court's intention. Interest — Harmonisation of interest rate and commencement date where judgment contains inconsistent provisions — intention determines correct rate (10% from trial judgment). Clerical corrections — currency/amount, typographical slips, and spelling errors amendable under slip rule. Expungement — removal of an order concerning interest on a sum already paid.
|
18 November 2025 |
|
A second appeal dismissed: uncertified locus notes were not prejudicial and the High Court properly found respondent’s customary ownership.
Land law – customary tenure – capacity to hold customary land (public/local government vs private company); Civil procedure – second appeal – scope and duty of first appellate court to re-evaluate evidence; Evidence – admissibility/certification of public documents and locus in quo notes; Procedural fairness – when uncertified records and locus omissions vitiate appeal; Appeals – interference with factual findings supported by evidence.
|
18 November 2025 |
|
Respondent acquired title by adverse possession; appellant's registration was fraudulent and must be cancelled.
Land law – adverse possession and limitation – bona fide occupant under s.29(2)(a) requires occupation from before 1995 – possession after 1993 not qualifying – title by adverse possession can vest in occupant or successor; Registration of Titles – registration tainted by fraud can be cancelled; restitution – facilitation payments recoverable (money had and received).
|
18 November 2025 |
|
Applicant failed to show sufficient cause to set aside judgment delivered in her absence; application dismissed with costs.
Civil procedure – setting aside ex parte judgment – sufficiency of cause; Service – service on appointed advocate constitutes effective service absent notice of change; Second appeals – limited to questions of law; Fair hearing – burden to prove non-service or incapacity by admissible evidence.
|
18 November 2025 |
|
Second appeal dismissed: respondent’s long possession established ownership; licensee and res judicata defences failed; costs awarded.
Civil procedure – Second appeal – limited role of Court of Appeal – may not re-evaluate evidence on facts unless first appellate court failed to apply legal principles. Land law – ownership by long possession/prescription v. licensee – evidence of long undisturbed occupation supports ownership. Res judicata – requires same parties/privies and same subject matter; prior clan tribunal judgment did not bar fresh suit.
|
18 November 2025 |
|
Re‑exportation in breach of a duty‑free licence bars recovery of re‑export losses; duties on domestically sold duty‑free sugar are refundable and quantifiable from revenue records.
Administrative law – duty‑free import licence – scope and purpose of quota exemptions – consequence of re‑export in breach of licence terms; Contract/tort interface – whether public authority owes private duty of care in administering statutory exemption; Remedies – refund of wrongly charged duties; exclusion of damages for losses arising from illegal re‑export (ex turpi causa); Evidence – requirement to specifically plead and prove special damages and to establish payment for refund claims.
|
18 November 2025 |
|
No valid appeal (leave not shown) against contempt order; stay pending appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction and merit.
Civil procedure – stay of execution pending appeal; appeal against contempt orders requires leave (Order 44, s.76 Civil Procedure Act); validity of notice of appeal as basis for stay; principles for grant of stay: prima facie success, irreparable harm, balance of convenience, absence of delay; taxation and execution by arrest.
|
14 November 2025 |
|
Plea-bargained sentence is unlawful if the court fails to expressly deduct remand time; appellate court may correct it.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Constitutional requirement to take remand time into account (Article 23(8)) – deduction must be arithmetical and expressly stated. Plea bargain – Judicial confirmation does not absolve court of duty to ensure sentence complies with constitutional sentencing rules. Appellate jurisdiction – Court of Appeal may correct illegality on record under Judicature Act by substituting a lawful sentence.
|
10 November 2025 |
