background image
profile image

Court of Appeal of Uganda

The Court of Appeal is the second highest court in the land.  It came into being following the promulgation of the 1995 Constitution, and the enactment of the Judicature Statute, 1996. Article 134 of the Constitution established the structure of the Court of Appeal.

While presiding over matters , it is duly constituted when it consists of an odd number of not less than three (3) justices of the Court of Appeal. It is this court that constitutes itself into a Constitutional Court in accordance with the Constitution to hear constitutional cases.

The Constitutional Court consists of fifteen (15) justices and handles the matters, issues or cases concerning the interpretation of the Constitution  When presiding over a constitutional matter, there must be a quorum of at least five (5) justices of the court.

Physical address
Twed Towers along Kafu Road, Nakasero,Kampala.
396 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
396 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2023
Extension of time granted for appeal due to counsel error; injunction refused as damages are ascertainable and balance disfavouring applicant.
* Civil procedure — Extension of time to appeal — Rule 5 Court of Appeal Rules — mistake by advocate as sufficient reason. * Civil procedure — Interim injunction — requirements: prima facie case, irreparable harm, balance of convenience — liquidated sums and possession by third parties defeat injunction. * Change of advocates — notice lodged with Registrar confers audience before court absent proof of prejudicial non‑service.
22 December 2023
Stay of execution refused where appeal lacked prospects, no irreparable harm shown, and applicant failed to offer security.
* Civil procedure – Stay of execution pending appeal; requirements: promptness, likelihood of success, irreparable harm/substantial loss, balance of convenience, security for due performance. * Allegation of forgery/fraud insufficient where based on denial only and no new evidence was available on appeal. * Failure or unwillingness to provide security and lack of cogent evidence of irreparable harm weigh against grant of stay.
7 December 2023
November 2023
Petition withdrawn; costs awarded due to lack of respondent consent and concurrent legislative amendment. Nominal fees only.
Constitutional law – withdrawal of constitutional petitions – costs following the event upon withdrawal without consent from all parties.
30 November 2023
29 November 2023
29 November 2023
29 November 2023
29 November 2023

 

29 November 2023
28 November 2023

 

15 November 2023
Termination under section 65(1)(a) need not be supported by reasons or a hearing if statutory notice or payment in lieu is given.
Employment law – Termination v. dismissal – s.65(1)(a) Employment Act – no requirement for reasons or hearing for termination under s.65(1)(a); payment in lieu satisfies notice; pleadings requirement – unpleaded remedies cannot be granted; general, aggravated and exemplary damages – limits and justification; Court of Appeal jurisdiction on points of law on Industrial Court appeals.
15 November 2023
Termination of employment doesn't require a reason if notice or payment in lieu is provided under Uganda's Employment Act.
Employment Law – Termination – Contract termination requires no reason if notice or payment in lieu is provided; Damages – reliance on pleadings for specific awards such as severance and loans.
15 November 2023
Appellate court upholds convictions and sentences for murder, finding no miscarriage of justice despite procedural irregularities.
Criminal Law – Murder – Legal procedure for guilty pleas – Evidence admission – Harshness of sentencing – Adequacy of legal defense.
10 November 2023
Appellate court upheld murder convictions and sentences despite procedural and evidentiary objections, finding no miscarriage of justice.
Criminal law – plea-taking procedure (Adan requirements) and failure of justice; Evidence – admissibility of confessions and s.30(b) unavailable‑author exception; Electronic evidence and fingerprints – foundation, expertise and retrospective inapplicability of 2022 Practice Directions; Ineffective assistance of counsel — when alleged failings do not amount to miscarriage of justice; Sentencing – consistency, sentencing guidelines and appellate restraint.
10 November 2023
Appeal against a plea-bargained 19-year murder sentence dismissed; plea agreement upheld and sentence confirmed.
* Criminal law – Plea bargaining – Validity and binding effect of plea-bargain agreements under the Judicature (Plea Bargain) Rules, 2016. * Sentencing – Appellate interference – Court may only interfere where sentence is illegal, based on wrong principle, overlooks material factor, or is manifestly excessive. * Mitigation – consideration of age, first-offender status, remorse and time on remand in sentencing for murder.
10 November 2023
Appellate court properly re-evaluated evidence, rejected an unreliable translated parish judgment, upheld respondent's possession title and damages.
Land law – appellate duty to re-evaluate evidence; admissibility and credibility of documentary evidence (translated Parish Chief judgment); proof of ownership on balance of probabilities via long occupation, loan and redemption; damages for trespass – review on manifest excessiveness.
10 November 2023
Appellants’ convictions upheld; sentence corrected to deduct remand period; compensation order for vehicle sale sustained.
Criminal law – murder and aggravated robbery – convictions upheld despite minor inconsistencies where corroborated; Evidence Act s.29 – information by co-accused leading to discovery admissible; identification and charge-and-caution statement admissible and corroborated; Sentencing – remand period (Article 23(8)) must be arithmetically deducted; Compensation – sale of vehicle used to facilitate crime permissible.
10 November 2023
A valid plea-bargained sentence was upheld but reduced six months for failure to credit full pre-trial remand.
* Criminal law – Plea bargain – Validity and procedure – Parties’ agreement binding where properly explained and voluntary – Appellate court’s limited scope to interfere. * Sentencing – Deduction of pre-trial remand – Trial court must accurately credit time spent on remand; appellate adjustment permissible for arithmetic error.
10 November 2023
Failure to credit remand custody under Article 23(8) rendered the sentence illegal and warranted resentencing by the appellate court.
Constitutional law – Article 23(8) – remand credit; Criminal law – sentencing discretion; illegality of sentence where remand not credited; appellate power under Judicature Act s.11 to substitute sentence; sentencing consistency and consideration of mitigating/aggravating factors.
9 November 2023
Appeal against aggravated defilement conviction and 30‑year sentence dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed.
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – Identification and credibility of victim’s testimony – Medical evidence (HIV status) admitted by agreement – No proof of transmission – Sentencing discretion – 30 years not manifestly excessive.
9 November 2023
Conviction based on single-witness identification and an effective 15 years 9 months sentence upheld; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – Aggravated robbery – Single identifying witness – identification principles and caution – evaluation of contradictions – identification parade not always fatal – sentencing discretion – mitigation and remand deduction.
9 November 2023
An 18‑year murder sentence was confirmed where remand time and mitigating factors were considered and sentence not manifestly excessive.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Murder – appellate review of sentence; deduction of remand time; mitigation and aggravation; when appellate court may interfere.
9 November 2023
The appellant’s murder conviction upheld; sentence reduced and two years’ remand credit applied.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – factors for correct identification (lighting, duration, distance, prior familiarity); Dying declaration – corroborative value; Alibi – duty to account for material time; Sentencing – appellate interference where sentence is manifestly excessive and remand credit miscalculated.
9 November 2023
Plea-bargain sentence is illegal if the court fails to deduct remand time under Article 23(8).
* Criminal law – Aggravated robbery – Sentence – Plea bargain – Court must comply with Article 23(8) by deducting period spent on remand; failure renders sentence illegal. * Plea bargaining – Judicature (Plea Bargain) Rules – parties must consult court on sentencing recommendations; court must satisfy itself on matters of law and fact. * Appeal – appellate court may set aside illegal sentence and substitute appropriate sentence under Judicature Act s.11.
9 November 2023
Appellate court reduced an excessive aggravated‑defilement sentence, deducted two years' remand, resulting in an 18‑year term.
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – Sentencing – Whether sentence harsh or excessive; failure to deduct pre‑trial remand; Article 23(8) requirement for definite sentences; appellate reappraisal and sentencing consistency; aggravating factor of HIV‑positive status.
9 November 2023
Confession lawfully admitted and corroborated; alibi rejected and sentence upheld for child-sacrifice murder.
Criminal law – admissibility of confession – voluntariness and recording by competent officer; circumstantial corroboration of confession; alibi defence – burden and plausibility; sentencing – child sacrifice as aggravating factor and appellate restraint on sentence interference.
9 November 2023
Appeal against rape convictions dismissed on evidential grounds; sentence reduced from 50 to 30 years (credit for remand).
Criminal law — Rape — Identification parades: rules and proper conduct; Evidence — contradictions and inconsistencies: minor discrepancies vs. grave contradictions; Hearsay — contemporaneous/excited reports in sexual offences admissible; Evidence Act ss.30 & 45 — tendering medical reports by witness familiar with author; Trial-within-a-trial — required only where voluntariness of confession is clearly contested; Sentence — appellate reduction where original sentence manifestly excessive.
9 November 2023
Appellate court confirmed sentence for aggravated defilement, finding remand deducted and sentence not excessive.
* Criminal law – Sentencing – Appellate interference limited to illegality, wrong principle, failure to consider material factor, or manifest excessiveness. * Sentencing – Deduction of remand time – Article 23(8) constitutional requirement and need for arithmetic deduction. * Aggravated defilement – Relevant aggravating factors: victim’s age, abuse of position, public/degrading manner of offence. * Mitigation – Guilty plea, remorse and remand period may mitigate but may be outweighed by aggravation.
8 November 2023
Conviction for aggravated defilement upheld; sentence reduced to account for remand, substituted at 17 years 10 months.
* Criminal law – aggravated defilement – conviction based on identification by a single child witness and corroboration by parent – conditions favouring correct identification. * Criminal procedure – alibi – prosecution duty to disprove alibi once raised – assessment of genuineness and supporting proof. * Sentencing – failure to deduct remand period renders sentence illegal – appellate court may substitute a lawful sentence.
8 November 2023
Appellate court reduced an excessive aggravated‑defilement sentence, substituting a lower term and awarding remand credit.
* Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – Sentencing – appellate review of sentence for manifest excessiveness. * Sentencing principles – aggravating and mitigating factors – first offender status and family responsibilities. * Remand credit – deduction of time spent on remand. * Judicial powers – Section 11 Judicature Act enabling substitution of sentence on appeal.
8 November 2023
Appellate court upheld aggravated defilement conviction and 10-year sentence, finding evidence and identification sufficiently proved.
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – Ingredients: age, disability, sexual penetration, accused’s participation – Evidence: single identifying witness, medical report, corroboration and Section 156 of the Evidence Act – Pleading compliance (Rule 66(2)) – Sentencing: appellate interference and sentencing guidelines.
8 November 2023
Plea-bargain valid and voluntary; absence of assessors not fatal; remand deducted; sentence upheld; appellant was an adult.
Criminal law – Plea bargaining – Requirement that charge and factual basis be explained in a language accused understands; voluntary plea and signature formalities; Assessors – mandatory only where trial follows plea of not guilty; Sentencing – remand deduction and guiding principles for interference; Juvenile offenders – proof of age required to trigger child procedures.
8 November 2023
Appellate court reduced manifestly excessive 35-year sentence for aggravated defilement and deducted remand period.
Criminal law – aggravated defilement; sentencing – deduction of remand period and non-retrospectivity of Rwabugande; appellate powers under s.11 Judicature Act to correct and substitute sentence; mitigation (guilty plea, first offender) versus aggravation (victim’s age, HIV exposure).
7 November 2023
Appeal dismissed: prosecution evidence and medical report disproved alibi; conviction and sentence for aggravated defilement upheld.
* Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – conviction can rest on truthful single victim and corroborative eyewitness evidence. * Evidence – inconsistencies: minor discrepancies do not necessarily undermine prosecution case. * Defence of alibi – accused need only raise it; prosecution must discredit it. * Age determination – uncontested medical evidence can establish age for trial; documentary parental evidence may be outweighed. * Sentencing – appellate interference only where wrong principle or manifestly excessive sentence.
7 November 2023
The appellant's rape conviction and 20-year sentence were upheld; minor inconsistencies did not undermine the prosecution's case.
Criminal law – Rape – Assessment of contradictions and inconsistencies in victim and medical testimony; minor discrepancies excusable after delay and do not necessarily undermine conviction; Defence rejected as improbable; Sentencing – 20 years’ imprisonment upheld, remand time deducted.
7 November 2023
Sale by a beneficiary of an undivided estate upheld where seller had capacity and administrator was estopped from denying the sale.
Land law – sale of beneficial interest in undivided estate; capacity to contract – lucidity periods and proof; administrator’s role – trustee vs beneficiaries; estoppel/acquiescence validating a transaction; specific performance as remedy for land; caveat to remain until transfer; costs and interest discretionary.
2 November 2023
A beneficiary’s sale of his beneficial interest is enforceable where the seller had capacity and the administrator acquiesced; specific performance ordered.
Land law – Sale by beneficiary of beneficial (equitable) interest; Capacity to contract – lucid intervals and contractual capacity despite intermittent mental illness; Succession law – letters of administration v beneficial interest; Estoppel/acquiescence by administrator; Specific performance – remedy for sale of land; Caveat – retained until transfer.
2 November 2023
Child's identification and medical corroboration upheld; sentence reduced due to improper aggravating factors and remand credit.
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – Identification by child victim; corroboration by medical report (PF3) – Proof of identity where victim familiar with accused; Sentencing – appellate interference where trial judge relied on unproven aggravating factor (alleged HIV status) and improperly treated denial as lack of remorse – credit for time on remand; Sentence reduction for manifest excessiveness.
2 November 2023
Applicants' challenge to a 30-year murder sentence and respondent's bid for life imprisonment were dismissed.
Criminal law – Murder – Sentence – Appellate interference with sentencing – appellate court will only alter sentence where wrong principle, overlooked material factor, or sentence manifestly excessive or unduly lenient; sentencing discretion; remand credit correctly applied.
2 November 2023
Instruction fees for a suit dismissed on a preliminary point are taxable by reference to the plaint value; Taxing Master’s discretion is limited.
* Civil procedure – taxation of costs – instruction fees – Sixth Schedule item 1(a)(iv) – valuation from plaint where suit dismissed on preliminary point of law. * Advocates Act s.55(3) – taxing officer’s discretion – limited by Advocates (Remuneration and Taxation of Costs) Regulations. * Whether dismissal on limitation is a 'decree' for taxation purposes. * Relief – refund of monies paid under bank guarantee where certificate of taxation later set aside; exercise of judicial discretion.
2 November 2023
A vague ground was struck for non-compliance with rules and a 32-year murder sentence was upheld as not manifestly excessive.
* Criminal appeal — procedural compliance — Rule 66(2) — specification of grounds; * Appellate review — duty to re-evaluate evidence as first appellate court; * Sentencing — exercise of judicial discretion — mitigating factors; * Murder — 32-year sentence not manifestly excessive; * Principle of consistency in sentencing.
1 November 2023
Failure to read back facts before accepting a guilty plea did not cause miscarriage of justice; life sentence upheld.
Criminal law – plea-taking procedure – reading charge and facts to accused – Adan guidance – Trial on Indictments Act s.139 – procedural omissions curable if no miscarriage of justice; Criminal law – murder – aggravating/mitigating factors – life imprisonment appropriate for premeditated, brutal killing with concealment of body.
1 November 2023
Conviction on changed plea upheld despite plea‑taking omission; life sentence for gruesome, premeditated murder affirmed.
Criminal procedure – plea-taking – omission to read facts/ingredients before accepting guilty plea – whether omission causes miscarriage of justice; Trial on Indictments Act s.139 – curative provision for procedural errors; Sentencing – life imprisonment for premeditated, brutal murder – appellate interference only if manifestly excessive.
1 November 2023
Old market land held to be Government land by long possession and excluded from respondent’s claimed title.
Land law – unregistered land – possession and limitation – long possession (Limitation Act) can vest ownership against a paper owner; bona fide occupant status on unregistered land; admissibility/tendering of cadastral maps; appellate reappraisal of evidence; unnecessary determination of counterclaim once title resolved by limitation.
1 November 2023
Long, uninterrupted possession by local authorities converted the market land into Government land, excluding it from the estate's claimed title.
Land law – ownership of unregistered land – long possession and limitation; admissibility and weight of oral evidence and hearsay; need to tender cadastral/survey maps in evidence; first appellate reappraisal of evidence.
1 November 2023
An out-of-time appeal against a Section 34 ruling was struck out; no extension was granted and costs awarded.
* Arbitration law – Section 34 applications to set aside arbitral awards – no general right of appeal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act absent parties' agreement (s.38). * Civil procedure – time limits for instituting appeals – Rule 83 (institution within 60 days) and Rule 82 (striking out out-of-time appeals). * Civil procedure – extension of time – Rule 5 requires a formal application showing sufficient cause; informal requests from the bar are insufficient. * Contempt/public policy allegations raised but not determined after strike-out for lateness.
1 November 2023
An out-of-time appeal against refusal to set aside an arbitral award was struck out; extension of time denied and costs awarded.
Arbitration law – Section 34 applications to set aside awards; right of appeal against Section 34 rulings; Court of Appeal Rules – institution of appeals and time limits; Rule 5 discretion to extend time; Rule 82 application to strike out out-of-time appeals; public policy/contempt allegations not determinative where procedural non-compliance exists.
1 November 2023
Conviction for rape upheld; procedural defects found non-prejudicial, but 60-year sentence reduced as manifestly excessive.
Criminal law — Right to fair hearing — right to cross-examine prosecution witnesses; Evidence — requirement of oath and weight of unsworn evidence; Trial on Indictments Act s66 — memorandum of agreed matters and admissibility of documents; Criminal procedure — summing up to assessors (s82) and missing records; Sentencing — appellate interference where sentence is manifestly excessive.
1 November 2023
Conviction upheld; procedural omissions did not vitiate trial, but 60-year sentence reduced to 35 years (remand credit).
* Criminal procedure – right to cross-examine – omission to record oath – whether failure to swear witness or misrecording occasioned miscarriage of justice. * Evidence – documents admitted at preliminary hearing – memorandum of agreed matters – effect of non-filing. * Criminal procedure – summing up to assessors – missing summing-up notes and effect on trial. * Sentencing – discretion of trial court – manifestly excessive sentence – appellate reduction.
1 November 2023
Vague ground of appeal struck out; 32-year murder sentence upheld as not manifestly excessive.
Criminal law – Appeal – Compliance with Rule 66(2) – specificity of grounds of appeal; Appellate duty to re-evaluate evidence; Sentencing discretion – manifestly excessive test – mitigation and consistency in murder sentences.
1 November 2023