background image
profile image

Court of Appeal of Uganda

The Court of Appeal is the second highest court in the land.  It came into being following the promulgation of the 1995 Constitution, and the enactment of the Judicature Statute, 1996. Article 134 of the Constitution established the structure of the Court of Appeal.

While presiding over matters , it is duly constituted when it consists of an odd number of not less than three (3) justices of the Court of Appeal. It is this court that constitutes itself into a Constitutional Court in accordance with the Constitution to hear constitutional cases.

The Constitutional Court consists of fifteen (15) justices and handles the matters, issues or cases concerning the interpretation of the Constitution  When presiding over a constitutional matter, there must be a quorum of at least five (5) justices of the court.

Physical address
Twed Towers along Kafu Road, Nakasero,Kampala.
213 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
213 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
September 2021
Appeal dismissed under Rule 100(1) for non-appearance after valid service; costs awarded against the appellant.
Civil procedure – service by affidavit – proceeding in absence of party served – dismissal under Rule 100(1) of the Rules of Court for non-appearance – costs against absent appellant.
2 September 2021
August 2021
26 August 2021
26 August 2021
26 August 2021
26 August 2021
26 August 2021
25 August 2021
Abolition of statutory leases does not extinguish existing lessees’ rights; appellant’s title to disputed plot was fraudulent.
Property law – disputed cadastral descriptions – Plot 15A Bishop Wasike Road v. Plot 20 Malukhu Road; Constitutional law – abolition of statutory leases (1995) does not extinguish existing lessees’ rights; Land law – validity of leases and certificates of title; equitable interests and remedies – assignment, possession, injunctions and damages; procedural irregularity and alleged fraud in land allocation.
25 August 2021
25 August 2021
25 August 2021
25 August 2021
24 August 2021
23 August 2021

 

23 August 2021

 

23 August 2021
20 August 2021
Interim stay granted where notice of appeal, substantive application and imminent garnishee execution were established.
Interim stay of execution — conditions for grant (competent notice of appeal; substantive application; imminent threat of execution) — garnishee and bank attachment — interim injunction restraining enforcement pending substantive determination.
20 August 2021
12 August 2021
12 August 2021
Appeal allowed: life sentence set aside and substituted with 28 years after failure to consider mitigating factors.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Appellate intervention where trial court fails to consider material mitigating factors – Re-sentencing under section 11 Judicature Act – Consideration of remand period and offender's status.
12 August 2021
Court reduced life sentence to 28 years after trial judge failed to consider mitigating factors and remand time.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Murder – Life sentence set aside for failure to consider mitigating factors; remand period and first offender status relevant; Court of Appeal’s power to resentence under the Judicature Act.
12 August 2021
Appellant's life imprisonment for murder reduced to 28 years due to inadequate consideration of mitigating factors.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Consideration of remand time in sentencing – Appeal against life imprisonment sentence for murder – Mitigating factors not fully considered.
12 August 2021
12 August 2021
11 August 2021

 

6 August 2021
July 2021
29 July 2021
29 July 2021
23 July 2021
A foreign-controlled company cannot hold mailo land; claims grounded on such illegal title fail, but unjust enrichment refund upheld.
Land law – mailo tenure – non-citizen corporate ownership prohibited (s.40 Land Act); acquisition void ab initio – illegality defeats claims founded on title; unjust enrichment – refund of excess purchase money; commercial/contractual disputes – burden of proof on counterclaims; appellate review of damages and interest.
22 July 2021

 

22 July 2021
22 July 2021
22 July 2021
22 July 2021
22 July 2021
21 July 2021
20 July 2021
Second appeal dismissed: first Appellate Court properly found credited funds were linked to a reversal/fraud, not an enforceable reward.
Civil procedure – Second appeal – scope: appellate court may appraise inferences of fact but not re‑evaluate evidence like a first appeal unless first appellate failed in duty. Banking law – disputed account movement – distinction between gratuitous reward and refund/reversal tied to fraudulent credit. Evidence – burden on plaintiff to prove entitlement; failure to produce requested documents does not automatically shift burden absent timely objection or contempt ruling. Pleading – defence alleging fraud may be dealt with on evidence even if particulars are limited.
20 July 2021
The court upheld the summary judgment, ruling the appellant's undertaking to refund money was legally binding.
Contract Law – Enforceability of undertakings – Summary judgment – Evaluation of evidence and triable issues
20 July 2021
20 July 2021
19 July 2021
19 July 2021
19 July 2021
16 July 2021
Court held appellants entitled to terminal benefits for caretaker period post-privatization, rejecting res judicata application.
Employment Law – Termination Benefits – Public Enterprises – Res Judicata – Appellants were entitled to terminal benefits for the caretaker employment period post-privatization.
16 July 2021
June 2021
Court admitted new regulatory evidence showing valuation reports were authored by a non‑registered valuer, allowing it on appeal.
Court of Appeal — admission of additional evidence on appeal — Rule 30(1)(b) — new, credible and material evidence — Surveyors Registration Board letter — expert qualification and admissibility of valuation reports — preliminary objections on legal capacity and procurement improper as pure points of law.
21 June 2021
A stay pending appeal requires demonstrable prospects of success; garnishee orders made absolute render a stay futile.
Civil procedure – Stay of execution pending appeal – Requirements: likelihood of success, irreparable harm, balance of convenience, no unreasonable delay – Record of appeal required to show prospects – Garnishee order nisi made absolute completes execution and cannot be stayed but may be set aside by issuing court.
10 June 2021
8 June 2021
8 June 2021

 

8 June 2021
The appeal contested unauthorized land entry and damages but resulted in a reduced compensation award.
Land Law - Trespass - Unauthorized construction on leased land - Evaluation of evidence - Special and general damages
8 June 2021