|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| June 2016 |
|
|
Whether eyewitness and medical evidence proved participation in murder and if a 25-year sentence was excessive.
Criminal law – Murder – participation and common intention – eyewitness identification and corroboration by medical evidence; Minor inconsistencies in testimony not fatal; Self-defence rejected; Sentence review – whether 25-year term manifestly excessive.
|
7 June 2016 |
|
Appeal allowed: life sentence set aside for failure to credit remand and substituted with 18 years imprisonment.
Criminal law – Sentencing – aggravated defilement – life imprisonment – appellate interference where sentence is manifestly excessive or wrong in law. Constitutional law – Article 23(8) – mandatory credit for time spent on remand. Sentencing principles – consideration of mitigating and aggravating factors; first offender status and remand period.
|
7 June 2016 |
|
Conviction for aggravated defilement upheld: reliable identification, unchallenged medical evidence and rejected alibi justified the verdict.
Criminal law – aggravated defilement – identification of single witness – daytime close-contact identification; corroboration by medical evidence. Criminal procedure – alibi – belated disclosure and requirement to raise alibi early; hospital records as rebuttal. Indictment drafting – improper inclusion of multiple independent instances under s.129(4) in one count; no substantial miscarriage when an alternative ingredient (victim under 14) proved.
|
7 June 2016 |
|
Murder conviction upheld; life sentence set aside and reduced to 20 years for failure to credit remand time.
Criminal law – Murder: circumstantial evidence and eyewitnesses can establish responsibility where no direct evidence of the killing exists. Criminal law – Malice aforethought and participation: assault and abandonment of a detained suspect can support a murder conviction. Sentencing – Mandatory credit for remand: failure to account for remand time under Article 23(8) renders a sentence illegal. Sentencing – Appeals: appellate court may set aside an illegal sentence and substitute an appropriate term, balancing deterrence and mitigation.
|
7 June 2016 |
|
Murder conviction reduced to manslaughter: dying declaration reliable but malice aforethought not proved; 15-year sentence imposed.
Criminal law – Homicide – reliability and corroboration of dying declarations; identification in daylight; aggressor doctrine and self-defence; malice aforethought—when murder reduces to manslaughter; sentencing following substitution of conviction.
|
7 June 2016 |
|
Appellate court reduced a manifestly excessive 45‑year sentence for aggravated defilement to 17 years after finding overlooked mitigating factors.
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – sentencing; appellate review where sentence is manifestly excessive or material factors overlooked; sentencing guidelines advisory not binding; mitigation (youth, remand, dependants) and aggravation (threats, violence, victim age, degree of injury, premeditation) relevant.
|
7 June 2016 |
|
Failure to call the accused to plead to an amended indictment renders the trial a nullity and warrants retrial.
Criminal procedure – Amendment of indictment – Section 51(1)(a) Trial on Indictments Act – mandatory fresh plea required; Plea‑taking as fundamental fair‑trial requirement (Constitution art 28(3)(b)); Conviction based on matter not pleaded (HIV status) – trial nullity; Retrial ordered — discretion exercised in interests of justice; Timelines and conditions for retrial (DPP readiness within three months).
|
7 June 2016 |
|
Failure to expressly account for remand custody renders an imprisonment sentence illegal; Court substituted an 18-year term.
Criminal law – Murder – Sentence – Requirement under Article 23(8) Constitution to take remand period into account – Failure to expressly do so renders sentence illegal – Appellate court may set aside and substitute a proper sentence; guilty plea and remand period as mitigating factors.
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Appellate court upheld aggravated defilement conviction: victim credible despite delay; 18-year sentence appropriate.
Sexual offences — corroboration of complainant’s evidence; delay in reporting and dominion/threats; identification by voice; probative value of belated medical evidence; sentencing discretion upheld.
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Failure to swear child witnesses necessitates corroboration, which was found satisfied by witness and medical evidence, so conviction upheld.
Criminal Law – Aggravated defilement – elements and standard of proof – evidence of child victims. Evidence – Child witnesses – voir dire and requirement to administer oath – effect where oath not administered: statutory requirement for corroboration (Section 40(3), Trial on Indictments Act). Evidence – Corroboration – maternal/neighbor testimony and medical examination can corroborate child victims. Identification – pre-existing acquaintance and circumstances can suffice. Delay in reporting/medical exam – explanation and consistency can preserve evidential value.
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Where the accused was under 18 when the offence occurred, sentencing must follow the Children Act; illegal sentence vacated and release ordered.
Children Act s104 – age at commission of offence is material; where accused was a child at commission remittance to Family and Children Court required; sentence imposed by High Court on such a person is illegal. Aggravated defilement – guilty plea and sentencing. Sentencing review – appellate interference where trial court acted on wrong principle or sentence manifestly excessive. Release where time served exceeds statutory maximum for child offenders.
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Intoxication did not negate intent to kill; life sentence set aside for failure to account remand, substituted with 20 years.
Criminal law – Murder – Intoxication as defence – Whether voluntary drinking negates malice aforethought; Sentencing – Failure to account remand under Article 23(8) renders imprisonment sentence illegal – appellate substitution of sentence under Section 11 Judicature Act.
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Voice identification corroborated by recent possession upheld convictions for murder and aggravated robbery; life sentences affirmed.
Criminal law – Identification: voice identification admissible where witness closely familiar with accused’s voice; caution needed where no face-to-face contact. Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence: recent possession of stolen property corroborates identification and supports conviction. Evidence – Visual identification at night requires proof of adequate lighting. Sentencing – Appellate interference limited; life imprisonment not excessive where trial court has exercised discretion and aggravating factors present.
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Whether aggravated defilement was proved and whether a 17‑year sentence was excessive.
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – proof of penetration – child’s unsworn testimony and need for corroboration; corroboration by mother’s contemporaneous report and medical evidence; identification and alibi – proximity and admission; sentencing – aggravating effect of guardian/step‑father relationship; appellate review of sentence.
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Minor contradictions and unproved police statements did not defeat reliable identification and corroboration of aggravated defilement.
Criminal law – aggravated defilement – identification evidence – reliability of night-time identification where victim and witness were familiar with accused and in close proximity. Evidence – contradictions and inconsistencies – distinction between minor and major contradictions; minor inconsistencies do not necessarily destroy credibility. Evidence – police statements – requirement that statements be properly proved (read back/recording officer) before being used to discredit witness. Appeal – appellate court’s duty to re-evaluate evidence afresh while recognizing trial court’s advantage in seeing witnesses.
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Voir dire omission not fatal where child evidence corroborated; conviction upheld, sentence reduced to 18 years.
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – Child witnesses of tender years – Failure to conduct voire dire – Requirement for corroboration – Medical evidence and contemporaneous report as corroboration – Identification – Sentencing: taking remand into account (Art.23(8) Constitution).
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Single‑witness identification upheld as reliable; life sentence reduced to 20 years on appeal.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – Single identifying witness – need for caution; factors favouring correct identification (familiarity, proximity, lighting, duration of observation, hearing) – conviction safe on single witness evidence where circumstances favourable. Sentencing – life imprisonment reduced to determinate term where mitigating factors and precedent justify opportunity for reform.
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Sentence of 16 years upheld where remand was considered and term fell within sentencing range.
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – Sentence – Requirement to account for time on remand under Article 23(8) – Appellate interference with sentencing discretion – Sentence within range and not excessive.
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Circumstantial evidence upheld conviction; sentence reduced for failure to credit remand and consider mitigating factors.
Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence – Inferences must exclude all reasonable hypotheses of innocence; alibi assessment; unchallenged voluntary confession; sentencing – credit for remand (Article 23(8)) and consideration of mitigating factors.
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Appellate court upheld aggravated defilement conviction on reliable single‑witness identification and found the sentence appropriate.
Criminal law – Sexual offences – Aggravated defilement – Single‑witness evidence and corroboration – Judge must warn but may convict if victim is credible. Criminal procedure – Identification – Unmistaken identification by a child who knew the accused. Criminal law – Alibi – Trial judge’s rejection of alibi upheld on appeal. Sentencing – Appellate restraint – interference only where sentence is manifestly excessive or wrong in principle; aggravating factor: offender’s position of trust as stepfather.
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Identification by familiar witnesses, corroborated by flight and disappearance, justified conviction despite absence of direct evidence.
Criminal law – Murder – Identification evidence at night; familiarity, distance and light; alibi disproved by prior police statement; circumstantial evidence and inference of guilt; caution in identification and circumstantial cases.
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Court upheld murder conviction, finding malice aforethought proved despite claim of obeying superior orders.
Criminal law – Murder – Malice aforethought – Inference from weapon used and fatal injuries – Superior orders do not negate liability – Eyewitness identification and appellate re-evaluation.
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Appellants' convictions and 15-year sentences for murder upheld: identification and corroborative circumstantial evidence found reliable; alibis rejected.
Criminal law – Murder – Identification evidence – Single identifying witness and corroboration – Circumstantial evidence (threats, disappearance) – Alibi defence – Sentence review, manifest excessiveness.
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Court upheld 15‑year sentence for aggravated defilement despite unaddressed mitigating factors (first offender, youth).
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – Sentencing – First offender status as a mitigating factor – Appellate interference limited to sentences that are illegal, based on wrong principle, overlook material factors, or are manifestly excessive – Sentencing consistency and precedents considered.
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Court upheld convictions based on reliable visual identification under moonlight and affirmed concurrent 20-year sentences, dismissing the appeal.
Criminal law – Identification evidence – Visual identification at night by familiar witnesses under moonlight; caution and assessment of identification evidence; corroboration by forensic/post-mortem evidence. Criminal procedure – Sentence – consideration of remand period when sentencing; appellate interference only for illegality, wrong principle, or manifestly excessive/lenient sentence. Appeal abatement on death of appellant.
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Circumstantial evidence (including dying declaration and flight) upheld conviction; sentence substituted though remand-crediting was criticized.
Criminal law – Aggravated robbery – conviction based on circumstantial evidence – admissibility and sufficiency of dying declaration and identification evidence; materiality of minor inconsistencies. Evidence – Circumstantial evidence – legal tests and requirement that surrounding facts exclude other hypotheses. Criminal procedure – Sentence – duty to take into account time spent on remand; aggravating factor: escape from lawful custody.
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Aggravated defilement conviction upheld based on credible child identification and corroborating immediate complaints.
Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – corroboration of complainant’s evidence; identification by a single child witness; immediate complaint as corroboration; alibi and malice defenses.
|
6 June 2016 |
|
Appeal dismissed: identification by complainant corroborated by admissions and confession; 15-year sentence upheld.
Criminal law – Rape – Identification of accused by single witness in a night-time attack – need for caution and corroboration. Evidence – Admissions before local authority and charge-and-caution statement as corroboration of identification and participation. Criminal procedure – Alibi and alleged grudge raised belatedly and not put to complainant reduces credibility. Sentencing – appellate interference only where sentence is excessive, wrong in principle, or important factors ignored.
|
6 June 2016 |
