background image
profile image

Court of Appeal of Uganda

The Court of Appeal is the second highest court in the land.  It came into being following the promulgation of the 1995 Constitution, and the enactment of the Judicature Statute, 1996. Article 134 of the Constitution established the structure of the Court of Appeal.

While presiding over matters , it is duly constituted when it consists of an odd number of not less than three (3) justices of the Court of Appeal. It is this court that constitutes itself into a Constitutional Court in accordance with the Constitution to hear constitutional cases.

The Constitutional Court consists of fifteen (15) justices and handles the matters, issues or cases concerning the interpretation of the Constitution  When presiding over a constitutional matter, there must be a quorum of at least five (5) justices of the court.

Physical address
Twed Towers along Kafu Road, Nakasero,Kampala.
19 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
19 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
October 2015
Appeal for interim stay dismissed; Applicants can raise legal issues in written submissions and post-ruling appeal.
Civil Procedure - Stay of proceedings - Discretion of lower court in allowing submissions - Judicial economy
30 October 2015
Court allowed post-judgment land-title evidence on appeal, finding it new, credible, relevant and likely dispositive.
Application to adduce additional evidence on appeal – criteria: evidence not available at trial; due diligence to obtain it; relevance, credibility and probable influence on outcome – post-judgment land title cancellation letter admissible; Article 126(2)(e) permits relaxation of technicalities to secure substantive justice.
28 October 2015
An appeal against dismissal for non-appearance is incompetent without first applying to set aside the dismissal or obtaining leave to appeal.
Civil procedure – dismissal for non-appearance (Order 9 r.22 CPR) – application to set aside dismissal (Order 9 r.23) – appeals not as of right – leave required under Order 44 r.2–3 – application for leave must first be made to the Court which made the order – elevation of trial judge does not oust jurisdiction of other High Court judges to hear reinstatement applications.
26 October 2015

 

26 October 2015
Interim stay denied where no imminent execution existed despite a pending appeal and substantive stay application.
Civil procedure – interim stay of execution – Rule 42 requirement to apply first in the High Court; Hwang Sung test for interim stay (substantive application pending and serious threat of execution); lack of imminent execution defeats interim relief.
26 October 2015
Court refused to strike out an appeal despite timing discrepancies, prioritising substantive justice over technicalities.
Civil procedure – notice of appeal – application to strike out for late service and failure to prosecute – computation of time – exclusion of Christmas vacation (Order 51 r.4 CPR) – certificate of correctness discrepancies – substantive justice (Article 126(1)(e)) – condemned unheard – appellate rights; discretion to refuse strike out.
23 October 2015
Donor’s conditional donation and fraudulent transfer of donated property defeated; recipients ordered to account, repay and company struck off.
Charitable donations – conditional donations and donor’s retained proprietary rights; fraudulent transfer of donated land; locus standi of donor; burden shifting under s.106 Evidence Act where recipient fails to account; invalid company incorporation – forgery and non-compliance with Companies Act; appointment of trustees to manage land owned for charitable purposes.
23 October 2015
Court granted a five-month interim injunction halting sale pending determination of the application to extend the prior injunction.
Civil procedure – interim injunction pending substantive application – requirements: substantive application pending and serious threat of execution; sale would render appeal/application nugatory; interim relief may be limited in duration; Registrar directed to urgently fix hearing; costs to abide outcome.
23 October 2015
Fraudulent procurement of a registered title established by substituted site plan, non‑production of original plan and supporting circumstantial evidence.
* Land law – registered title – fraud in procurement of title – higher standard of proof applicable; substitution of site plan and failure to produce original plan justify adverse inference. * Evidence – non-production of documents – permissible adverse inference where party undertook to produce documents. * Circumstantial evidence – threats and disappearance of official file can support inference of fraudulent scheme.
23 October 2015
Respondent's fraud claim was timely; purchaser failed to acquire good title from an impostor, so appeal dismissed.
Limitation — accrual of cause of action in fraud cases — discovery rule; Limitation — effect of minority and letters of administration on accrual; Land law — transfer obtained from impostor does not vest good title in purchaser; Evidence — adverse inference where key witnesses (vendor, agent) are not called; Proof of forgery — handwriting evidence and evidential weight.
22 October 2015
Court granted extension of time and stayed execution pending appeal, finding serious questions on Attorney General’s authority to enter consent judgments.
* Civil procedure – extension of time and leave to appeal – court’s inherent jurisdiction and Rules to prevent abuse of process. * Civil procedure – stay of execution pending appeal – requirement of serious question to be tried, irreparable harm and balance of convenience. * Public law – consent judgments – authority of Attorney General to bind a public institution; potential involvement of public funds. * Procedure – applications made informally under Court of Appeal Rules where special circumstances exist.
22 October 2015
Application for injunction dismissed as wrongly directed at non-parties and improperly before the Court of Appeal.
Civil procedure – Interim relief – Injunctions – Court of Appeal cannot grant injunctions against non-parties not before the court; proper party and forum required – Right to be heard (audi alteram partem).
20 October 2015
Surveying with the respondent’s household permission negated trespass; co‑defendants who stayed outside were not liable.
* Tort – Trespass to land – Unauthorized entry versus licence/permission – permission given by occupant’s household negating trespass; * Land law – Surveying and demarcation after purchase – lawful means to ascertain boundaries; * Evidence – weight of witness corroboration on permission; * Appeal – scope of second appeal and re-evaluation of evidence; * Title – possession and completed purchase can suffice where certificate of title not yet registered.
20 October 2015
Court upheld misuse of joint-venture funds, admissibility of computer print-outs, fraud finding, and interest at 11% on damages.
Evidence – Electronic/computer-generated documents – print-outs may constitute primary evidence if authentic; Joint venture – misuse/diversion of funds – breach and recoverable loss; Accounting disputes – proof of under-declaration and tax treatment; Damages – award of general damages for foreseeable foreign exchange loss where special damages not strictly proved; Lifting corporate veil – personal liability of directing mind where company used for fraud; Interest – discretionary award, 11% p.a. affirmed/awarded.
16 October 2015
Conviction upheld on identification and corroboration points, but appellant released because he should have been treated and sentenced as a child.
* Criminal law – Rape – Identification – circumstances favouring identification and guidelines for positive identification in poor light. * Criminal law – Sexual offences – Corroboration of complainant’s evidence not mandatory; historic corroboration rule rejected as discriminatory. * Children Act – Age inquiry – duty of court to ascertain apparent age and take evidence; doubt as to age resolved in favour of accused. * Sentencing – Child offender – referral to Family and Children Court and statutory limits on detention for child offenders; release where detention already exceeds statutory maximum.
16 October 2015
Court set aside High Court orders that altered the appellant's title without hearing, ordering rehearing and reinstatement of title.
Constitutional law – right to fair hearing (Article 28) – orders affecting proprietary rights – error apparent on the face of the record – review – restitution of title – rehearing before another judge – reinstatement of title and caveat – costs.
7 October 2015
Appellant's alibi and single‑witness challenges failed; conviction and 34‑year sentence for murder upheld.
* Criminal law – Murder – Identification by single witness – special caution but conviction permissible where conditions favourable and witness credible; * Criminal law – Alibi – burden remains on prosecution to disprove beyond reasonable doubt; * Evidence – appellate re‑appraisal of credibility and demeanor; * Sentence – appellate restraint unless sentence manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.
7 October 2015
Confessions recorded by one officer from multiple suspects are unsafe; reliable identification can sustain conviction; omnibus sentence unlawful.
* Criminal law – confession statements – admissibility – impropriety and unreliability where one police officer records confessions from multiple suspects charged with same offence – statements admissible but no probative value. * Evidence – visual identification – single identifying witness – conditions for reliable identification (distance, lighting, prior acquaintance) and sufficiency to sustain conviction. * Sentencing – illegality of omnibus sentence – appellate court power to substitute separate sentences under section 11 Judicature Act; consideration of remand time and mitigation.
7 October 2015
Prolonged delay in pursuing appeal defeats entitlement to an interim injunction preserving disputed land.
Interim injunctions pending appeal; preservation of right of appeal; dilatory conduct by appellant; delay in filing application for leave to appeal; entitlement to enjoy fruits of decree; costs against unsuccessful interim applicant.
2 October 2015