Results.
56 judgments found.
Citation
Sort by Citation ascending
Judgment date
Sort by Judgment date ascending
December 2012
An application for review must meet statutory grounds and cannot be based on ignorance of the law or procedural errors alone.
Civil procedure — review of judgment — grounds for review — error on the face of the record — discovery of new and important evidence — summary dismissal of application for review — right to a fair hearing.
19 December 2012
Appeal allowed: insufficient evidence and absence of indemnity/directions nullified third‑party reimbursement orders against the appellant.
Civil procedure — Third‑party proceedings — Order 1 rule 18 CPR — Requirement to apply for directions and proof of contractual indemnity
Carrier liability — Loss in transit — Evaluation of evidence required to establish custody and joint liability
Statutory formalities — Uganda Railways Corporation Act s58(3)(b) — Evidential relevance of receipts for carriage custody
14 December 2012
Court amended its judgment under Rule 36 to grant a previously omitted certificate for two counsel.
Civil procedure — Correction of judgments — Clerical/arithmetical mistakes — Rule 36 — Amendment to award certificate for two counsel
13 December 2012
13 December 2012
Failure to sum up to assessors vitiated the trial; conviction quashed and applicant released in interest of justice.
Criminal procedure — Assessors: mandatory oath and summing-up — omission to swear assessors may be irregular but not always fatal; failure to sum up to assessors is fundamental and vitiates trial; retrial discretion where long delay may justify release.
6 December 2012
November 2012
The court dismissed the appeal, confirming the election results as valid amidst unproven allegations of electoral misconduct.
Election Law — Election Petition — Allegations of electoral offences and non-compliance with electoral laws — Burden and standard of proof in election disputes.
23 November 2012
Registrar may extend time to serve for record, validating an appeal despite counsel’s inadvertence.
Civil procedure
— Appeals — Filing and service of application for record within 30 days — Effect of non‑compliance and role of proof of service
— Extension of time — Registrar’s jurisdiction under Practice Direction to extend time and validate documents
— Effect of counsel’s inadvertence — Inadvertence not fatal where client promptly seeks extension of time
23 November 2012
Appeal dismissed: taxed bill of costs and interest/accountability claims were not proved; each party to bear own costs.
Civil procedure — security for costs — taxation of a bill of costs and appropriate remedies against a taxed or excessive bill (appeal or review)
Receivership — duty of receiver to account for all receipts and payments; requirement to prove unexplained debits with admissible evidence
Contract/evidence — exclusion of oral evidence that contradicts a written agreement and the burden to prove claimed interest computations
19 November 2012
Claims for excessive legal fees, additional interest and an unexplained ledger debit were unproven; appeal dismissed, parties bear own costs.
Civil procedure — Security for costs and taxation — Challenge to taxed bill of costs — Remedy by appeal or review
Receivership — Accounting by receivers — Duty to account for all receipts and interest — Evidentiary burden to prove unexplained debits
Contract/Interest — Accrual of interest on sale proceeds — Effect of transfer delay caused by litigation
19 November 2012
Bail pending appeal granted for grave medical condition supported by hospital report, subject to cash deposit and sureties.
Criminal law — Bail pending appeal — Medical grounds (grave illness) — Sufficiency and admissibility of medical reports — Mulago Hospital report and medical superintendent’s testimony
Criminal procedure — Conditions of bail — Cash deposit, periodic reporting and sureties — Ensuring attendance and public interest
15 November 2012
October 2012
A judge exceeded jurisdiction by converting a taxation appeal into disciplinary proceedings and breaching an interim stay.
Civil procedure — Interim orders of registrars — Effect and duty to obey Court of Appeal interim stay of High Court proceedings
Advocates Act — Disciplinary jurisdiction — Whether a High Court may summarily suspend an advocate or convert an appeal into disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary Committee procedure and fair hearing rights
Civil procedure/Advocates Act — Orders for costs — Proper forum and procedure for setting aside or varying another judge’s costs order
19 October 2012
Applicant failed to show arguable grounds; leave to appeal refused and application dismissed.
Civil procedure — Leave to appeal — Whether applicant raised prima facie or arguable grounds warranting leave — Order 44 CPR; Rule 40 Judicature (Court of Appeal Rules) SI 13/10
Appeal — Right to appeal — Statutory nature — Where no automatic right exists applicant must obtain leave to appeal
12 October 2012
Appellate court held the respondent failed to prove bribery or EC non‑compliance sufficiently to nullify the election.
Election law
— Illegal practices (bribery) — Ingredients and proof: gift, agent, intent; recipients must be proven registered voters — Parliamentary Elections Act s.68
— Non‑compliance by Electoral Commission — Distinct ground from bribery; s.61(1)(a) vs s.61(1)(b)
Evidence — Partisan witnesses and photographic evidence — Require independent corroboration and authentication
5 October 2012
September 2012
CL|Arbitration Award|Set Aside Arbitration Award|Civil Appeal Procedure
20 September 2012
Advocate’s negligence may constitute sufficient cause for extension; defective affidavit should be cured, not cause dismissal.
Civil procedure — Extension of time — Delay caused by counsel’s negligence may constitute sufficient cause under Rule 5; Registrar erred in dismissing application for lack of copy of letter applying for proceedings (r.83(3)) and for defective affidavit; defective affidavit should be struck out/amended, not lead to dismissal; land cases — parties entitled to exhaust appeal rights.
7 September 2012
Failure to serve required appeal documents within prescribed time renders an election appeal incompetent and liable to be struck out.
Election law — Appeals — Service of Notice of Appeal and request for record — Failure to comply with time and court order — Appeal incompetent
Civil procedure — Essential step — Strike out under Rule 82 of the Court of Appeal Rules
Procedure — Court orders — Duty to obey and seek timely clarification if uncertain
5 September 2012
August 2012
Repeated adjournments and the need for expeditious disposal justified dismissal; refusals of procedural applications and bias allegations failed.
Election law — Procedure/Adjournments — Dismissal for want of prosecution due to persistent adjournments and need for expeditious resolution under Parliamentary Elections Act
Civil procedure — Fair hearing — Refusal to amend pleadings, to produce originals, and to cross‑examine high‑ranking official — Discretion of trial judge and absence of abuse of discretion
Judicial conduct — Allegation of bias — Real likelihood and reasonable‑person tests applied; no reasonable apprehension of bias found
24 August 2012
Uncertified declaration forms inadmissible without notice to Electoral Commission; intimidation claims require corroboration; appeal allowed.
Election law
— Evidence — Admissibility of uncertified Declaration of Results forms — Certified copies or notice to Electoral Commission required
— Non‑compliance and irregularities — Substantial effect on results — Onus on petitioner to prove substantial influence
Evidence — Voter intimidation — Allegations require corroboration (police report or equivalent)
13 August 2012
Court dismissed application to strike out election appeal, finding notice lodged and record served in time.
Election law — Appeals — Striking out notice of appeal — Whether essential steps to prosecute appeal were taken
Civil procedure — Filing and service — Timeliness of lodging notice of appeal and serving record of appeal under Court of Appeal rules
Procedure/Evidence — Registrar's certification and proof of service — Certified copies and affidavits as sufficient proof of timely record
6 August 2012
The respondent successfully challenged the candidate’s equivalency certificate, resulting in annulment and fresh elections.
Electoral law — Qualification for local government office — A‑level or equivalent — Validity of NCHE equivalency where underlying certificates are challenged
Evidence — Burden of proof in election petitions — Candidate’s duty to produce authentic academic certificates
Administrative law — Equivalency by statutory body — Courts may inquire into existence/authenticity of underlying qualifications
1 August 2012
July 2012
Whether proved acts of bribery at campaign events justified annulment of the appellant’s election.
Election law — Illegal practice (bribery) — Proof and sufficiency of witness evidence — Single proven incident can annul election
Evidence — Voter registration proof — Role of voters’ card versus voters’ register and burden to prove recipient was a registered voter
Constitutional law — Right to fair hearing — Whether selective consideration of pleaded incidents (random sampling) vitiates judgment
20 July 2012
Bribery allegation unproven; disenfranchisement occurred but failed to show substantial effect on election result.
Election law
— Bribery — Proof and agency — Requirement of cogent, corroborated evidence to establish agent’s bribery and candidate’s knowledge
— Non‑compliance/Disenfranchisement — Substantial effect on result — Numerical assessment required under PEA s61(1)(a) and s50/s53 procedures
Evidence — Standard and burden in election petitions — Balance of probabilities with heightened scrutiny for electoral irregularities
3 July 2012
June 2012
Failure to show sufficient, corroborated reason for delay in an election appeal warranted dismissal of the reference with costs.
Election petitions — extension of time — sufficient cause — mistake of counsel/inadvertence — hearsay and lack of corroboration — strict time limits for election appeals — Rule 83 inapplicable to election petition appeals — judicial discretion and review.
28 June 2012
Applicant failed to prove sufficient cause or provide evidence to extend time to serve a letter in an election appeal.
Election law — Election petitions — Extension of time to take procedural step — Sufficiency of reasons and required vigilance
Civil procedure — Extension of time — Mistake of counsel — Need for credible corroborative evidence when alleging inadvertence
28 June 2012
Court of Appeal dismissed appeal for lack of prior leave from trial court; late, dilatory challenge denied with costs.
Civil procedure
— Appeals — Leave to appeal from revision orders — Whether appellate court may grant leave where applicant failed to seek leave from trial court — Order 44 CPR; s.83 Civil Procedure Act
— Procedure and timeliness — Dilatory challenge to judgment and effect on execution and abuse of process
14 June 2012
The court dismissed an appeal application due to non-compliance with procedural requirements for seeking prior leave from the trial court.
Civil Procedure — application for leave to appeal — necessity of first seeking leave from trial court — procedural compliance required.
14 June 2012
Interlocutory High Court orders in election petitions are not appealable under s.66(1) PEA; the notice of appeal was struck out.
Election law — Appeals — Interlocutory orders in election petitions — No right of appeal under s.66(1) Parliamentary Elections Act — Need for expeditious resolution
Civil procedure — Election petition rules — "Determination" denotes final decision after hearing — Rules 28, 29 and 13 support restrictive appellate rights
14 June 2012
14 June 2012
An applicant must show a legal interest or disclose vital facts before being added as respondent to an appeal.
Civil procedure
— Joinder of parties (appeal) — Addition of non‑party as respondent requires showing orders will legally affect their interests or their presence is necessary to avoid multiplicity of suits — inherent power/Order 1 r.10(2) CPR
— Inherent powers — Court may not compel joinder against appellant’s choice absent strong justification or disclosure of material facts
13 June 2012
Service irregularity within seven days does not automatically void an election petition absent prejudice; substantial non‑compliance warranted fresh election.
Election law
— Service of notice — Whether failure to serve within seven days renders petition a nullity — Directory versus mandatory rule; Article 126(2)(e)
— Evidence — Affidavits and hearsay in election petitions — Liberal approach to affidavits of illiterate deponents; hearsay excluded where no personal knowledge
— Non‑compliance with electoral laws — Substantial effect on results — Quantitative and qualitative assessment leading to set aside of election
11 June 2012
Court upheld revocation of fraudulent Letters of Administration, finding mismanagement and exclusion of rightful beneficiaries from the deceased's estate.
Succession and administration of estates — Fraudulent procurement of Letters of Administration — Exclusion of beneficiaries — Mismanagement of estate — True and correct inventory — Appointment of administrators — Evaluation of oral evidence in the absence of scientific (DNA) evidence — Civil procedure — Costs — Allegation of judicial bias.
8 June 2012
May 2012
Wrongful dismissal affirmed but reinstatement refused; damages award upheld and appeal dismissed.
Employment law — Unfair dismissal — Reinstatement discretion under section 71 Employment Act — Court may refuse reinstatement where statutory criteria met
Civil damages — Assessment of damages — Appellate restraint in interfering with discretionary awards — Omnibus award not set aside absent manifest error or cross-appeal
State liability — Vicarious liability for alleged arrest/assault abroad — Evaluation of evidence at trial
29 May 2012
Unsigned DR forms do not automatically invalidate votes where matching originals and agents’ signatures corroborate results.
Election law — Declaration of Results forms — Effect of presiding officer's failure to sign on validity of votes
25 May 2012
Assault causing actual bodily harm was not found to constitute moral turpitude for Article 80(2)(f) disqualification.
Constitutional law — Qualifications for election — Crime involving moral turpitude — Requires extreme depravity or conduct shocking to the moral sense of the community — Art. 80(2)(f)
Electoral law — Disqualification — Role of case‑by‑case assessment and community standards in determining moral turpitude — Caution in curtailing political rights
24 May 2012
Court upheld A‑level as sufficient qualification, rejected retrospective application of Education Act, and validated religiously‑based affidavits.
Election law — Qualifications for Parliament — Formal education/A‑level requirement and non‑retrospective application of Education Act 2008
Election procedure — Election petition pleadings — Cause of action against Electoral Commission — Requirement of pleading versus evidence
Evidence — Oaths and affirmations — Religious freedom, Oaths Act s 5(1)(b) and validity of affidavits
21 May 2012
Appeal allowed: court set aside striking-out of defence; causation, mitigation and curable errors require trial.
Civil procedure
— Pleadings — Striking out defence — Whether defence discloses reasonable answer to plaint
— Inherent powers of court — Use sparingly; not to deprive parties of substantive justice
Tort — Negligence — Causation and mitigation — Issues for trial, not summary striking out
21 May 2012
When a candidate’s academic certificates are impugned, the candidate must prove authenticity; fraudulent certificates nullify the degree and election.
Election law — Candidate qualification — Validity of academic certificates — Burden to prove authenticity where certificates are impugned — Abdul Balingirira principle
Evidence — Electronic and foreign consul communications — Admissibility of e‑mails and consul affidavit in impeachment of documents — Electronic Transactions Act s.8
Election law — Effect of fraudulent foundational certificate — Contagious invalidity of subsequent university degree and disqualification from nomination
16 May 2012
Stay of proceedings denied; Registrar's limitations emphasized, conserving status quo pending High Court decisions.
Civil procedure — Stay of proceedings — Judicial authority of registrars to issue interim orders — Appeal process and discretion.
11 May 2012
April 2012
Intending appellants in election appeals must diligently take prescribed steps; failure to do so may warrant striking out the appeal.
Election law — Parliamentary election petitions — Time limits for Notice, Memorandum and Record of Appeal — Time is of the essence
Civil procedure — Computation of time — Exclusion of day of event in computing prescribed days — Interpretation Act s.34(1) and Court of Appeal Rules
Appeals — Essential steps and strike out — Duty of intending appellant to prosecute appeal diligently — Court may strike out under Rule 82
30 April 2012
Failure to take essential appellate steps and to seek extensions led to striking out of an election petition appeal.
Civil procedure — Appeals
— Election petition appeals — Essential steps (notice, memorandum, record) and duty to prosecute — Computation of time exclusive of day of judgment (Interpretation Act s.34(1)(a))
— Striking out appeal — Failure to take essential steps and failure to apply for extension — Rules 29, 30, 31 and 82 of Court of Appeal/Parliamentary Elections (Election Petitions) Rules
30 April 2012
Applicant failed to show prima facie case, irreparable harm or balance of convenience to halt an almost-complete commission.
Constitutional law — Interim relief — Temporary injunction — Requirements: prima facie case, irreparable harm, balance of convenience
Administrative law — Commissions of Inquiry — Allegations of bias — Need for specific evidence, not speculation
Civil procedure — Delay/laches — Delay in seeking interlocutory relief relevant to grant of injunction
30 April 2012
Failure to serve the letter requesting High Court proceedings rendered the notice of appeal incompetent and was struck out.
Election law — Appeals procedure — Service of written application for High Court proceedings — Failure to serve a copy is an essential, fatal defect
Civil procedure — Court of Appeal Rules — Rule 82 and Rule 83(2)–(3) — Proof of service of application for record required for time computation
Constitutional/election law — Expeditious disposal of election matters — Article 140 and Parliamentary Elections Act impose strict time obligations
30 April 2012
Late court‑fee payment was an irregularity; bribery not proved as recipients' voter status and corroboration were lacking.
Election law
— Procedure — Payment of court fees and filing time — Late payment held irregularity not fatal where petition presented within statutory period
— Electoral offences — Bribery — Elements: gift to a registered voter by candidate/agent with intent to influence voting; proof of recipients' voter status required
Evidence — Witness credibility — Partisan/accomplice witnesses require caution and independent corroboration in bribery allegations
20 April 2012
No appeal to the Court of Appeal lies from a High Court decision on electoral complaints where statute and Constitution make it final.
Election law — Appeals — Finality of High Court decisions under Article 64(4) Constitution and section 15(4) Electoral Commission Act; Competency of appeal to Court of Appeal; Integrity of court record — alleged forged leave-to-appeal entry; Registrar and advocate professional conduct referral to Law Council.
17 April 2012
Court nullified the respondent's election for bribery by his agent via a last‑minute donation and ordered fresh elections.
Electoral law
— Election petitions — Burden and elevated civil standard of proof in election challenges — Parliamentary Elections Act s.61
— Illegal practices/Bribery — Candidate liable for acts of agent; last‑minute donations during campaign may constitute bribery — Parliamentary Elections Act s.68 and s.61(1)(c)
Remedies — Nullification and fresh election — Effect of substantial corrupt influence on poll validity
17 April 2012
Whether church offertory or pledges by a candidate during campaign constitute illegal fundraising under s.68(7)-(9) vis‑à‑vis constitutional freedom of religion.
Election law — Illegal practice — Fundraising during campaign — Interpretation of s.68(7)-(9) of the Parliamentary Elections Act and requirement of intent to influence voters
Evidence — Affidavits and viva voce testimony — Admissibility and weight where affidavit is struck off; oral evidence in open court remains examinable
Constitutional law — Freedom of religion — Participation in religious offertory/fundraising protected unless shown to be campaign fundraising aimed at influencing votes
13 April 2012
March 2012
Appellant’s election reinstated: trial court erred on handwriting evidence and denied constitutionally protected cross‑examination.
Election law — Qualifications — Academic equivalence and proof required for nomination — Awarding institution must cancel/withdraw to invalidate qualification
Evidence — Handwriting/signature comparison — Use of S.72 of the Evidence Act and need for expert evidence — Judicial caution required
Constitutional law — Right to fair hearing — Cross‑examination of court‑called witness — Article 28(1) of the Constitution
30 March 2012
Standard of proof in parliamentary election petitions is balance of probabilities; irregularities did not substantially alter the outcome.
Election law
— Standard of proof — Parliamentary election petitions — Proof on balance of probabilities (Parliamentary Elections Act s.61(3))
— Irregularities — Unsigned declaration of results forms; ballot stuffing; tampering with ballot boxes — Whether non-compliance substantially affected results
— Evidence and remedies — Aborted recount due to tampered ballot boxes — Insufficient proof of systemic malpractice
30 March 2012
30 March 2012
20 March 2012
