background image
profile image

Court of Appeal of Uganda

The Court of Appeal is the second highest court in the land.  It came into being following the promulgation of the 1995 Constitution, and the enactment of the Judicature Statute, 1996. Article 134 of the Constitution established the structure of the Court of Appeal.

While presiding over matters , it is duly constituted when it consists of an odd number of not less than three (3) justices of the Court of Appeal. It is this court that constitutes itself into a Constitutional Court in accordance with the Constitution to hear constitutional cases.

The Constitutional Court consists of fifteen (15) justices and handles the matters, issues or cases concerning the interpretation of the Constitution  When presiding over a constitutional matter, there must be a quorum of at least five (5) justices of the court.

Physical address
Twed Towers along Kafu Road, Nakasero,Kampala.
5 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
5 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
April 2001
A competing operator’s licence was lawful; unsigned administrative report had no evidentiary value, fraud unproven, appeal dismissed.
Transport licensing – validity of operator’s licence – unsigned administrative report lacks evidentiary value – Article 126(2)(e) misapplied if used to validate unsigned documents – Traffic and Road Safety Act ss.95(1), 91(2)(e) on consultation and regard to interests – fraud must be strictly pleaded and proved – duty to assess damages but non-assessment not always fatal.
27 April 2001
Criminal law
26 April 2001
Compliance with rule 82’s written request requirement prevents striking out a notice of appeal despite failure to prosecute the appeal.
Civil procedure – Court of Appeal Rules, rule 82 – effect of written application for copy of record within time – whether further duty to follow up preparation of record imposed. Notice of appeal – failure to prosecute appeal after complying with rule 82 – court’s remedial limits. Abuse of process – potential for delaying execution versus strict interpretation of procedural rules.
20 April 2001
Original acquisition and long occupation established the respondent's superior title; appeal dismissed with costs.
Property dispute – caveat removal – title by original acquisition from customary chief – long occupation and development – prescription vs. original title – res judicata (lack of prior records) – appellate re-appraisal of evidence under Rule 31(2).
11 April 2001
6 April 2001