background image
profile image

Court of Appeal of Uganda

The Court of Appeal is the second highest court in the land.  It came into being following the promulgation of the 1995 Constitution, and the enactment of the Judicature Statute, 1996. Article 134 of the Constitution established the structure of the Court of Appeal.

While presiding over matters , it is duly constituted when it consists of an odd number of not less than three (3) justices of the Court of Appeal. It is this court that constitutes itself into a Constitutional Court in accordance with the Constitution to hear constitutional cases.

The Constitutional Court consists of fifteen (15) justices and handles the matters, issues or cases concerning the interpretation of the Constitution  When presiding over a constitutional matter, there must be a quorum of at least five (5) justices of the court.

Physical address
Twed Towers along Kafu Road, Nakasero,Kampala.
10 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
10 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
March 1999
An applicant who accepts and pays taxed costs without protest cannot pursue a reference challenging the taxation.
Costs — Taxation of costs — Payment of taxed costs — Effect of acceptance and payment without protest — approbation and reprobation — Abuse of process — Failure to disclose payment in ex parte proceedings.
31 March 1999
A statutory successor council can be substituted for a repealed corporate body when the statute transfers assets, liabilities and proceedings.
Administrative law – Statutory repeal and succession – Effect of Local Governments (Resistance Councils) Statute 1993 – Sections 49, 50 and 51 transfer assets, liabilities and pending proceedings to successor council; Civil procedure – substitution of parties – Order 1 r 10; Pleadings – Order 6 r 27 requirement to raise points of law in pleadings; Appellate jurisdiction – exercise of original-jurisdiction powers under judicature statute to correct party misjoinder.
30 March 1999
Appellate court wrongly displaced trial finding; purchaser had title (sale or adverse possession) and was bona fide purchaser.
Land law – possession, sale and part performance; adverse possession; bona fide purchaser for value; appellate admission of additional evidence under s.81 C.P.A.; probative value of municipal receipts and vouchers.
19 March 1999
Appellate court’s additional evidence order upheld; intermediate purchaser had title (or adverse possession); appeal allowed.
Civil procedure — Admission of additional evidence on appeal under s.81(1) C.P.A. — exceptional exercise of discretion — sketch plan and locus in quo evidence; Property law — Part performance and transfer of land by consented possession; Adverse possession — long undisturbed occupation; Evidence — municipal receipts and vouchers — relevance to plot identification; Equity — bona fide purchaser for value without notice.
19 March 1999
Application to adduce evidence that opposing counsel lacked a practising certificate was refused as irrelevant to the appeal's merits.
Court of Appeal – Rule 29(1)(b) – admission of additional evidence on appeal – discretionary power – applicant must show sufficient reason – evidence about advocate’s practising certificate concerns counsel’s conduct not merits – application dismissed.
11 March 1999
Registrar lawfully issued warrant under s.47(2) Judicature Statute; applicant’s challenge dismissed with costs.
Execution of appellate judgments – Section 47(2) Judicature Statute – Registrar’s power to issue warrants of attachment; Abuse of court process; Interaction with s.29 Civil Procedure Act and absence of Court of Appeal execution rules.
5 March 1999
Registrar may issue warrants to execute Court of Appeal orders under Section 47(2); issuance was not an abuse of process.
Execution of appellate decrees; Registrar's powers under Section 47(2) Judicature Statute; warrant of attachment by Court of Appeal Registrar; abuse of court process; relation to Civil Procedure Act (s.29).
5 March 1999
Appeal struck out for non-compliance with legal rules on specifying points of law in the memorandum.
Civil procedure – memorandum of appeal defects – compliance with rules – specificity in points of law – Rule 85(1) of the Court of Appeal rules.
4 March 1999
An application for additional security for appeal costs requires clear evidence of inability to pay; absent such proof the order is set aside.
Civil procedure — security for costs on appeal — party seeking security must prove necessity and inability to pay — receivership/liquidation and encumbered assets may be prima facie evidence but are not conclusive — insufficient evidence requires setting aside order for additional security.
4 March 1999
4 March 1999