Judgments
30,029
judgments
All courts
Explore judgments from all courts.
Explore all courts →
High Courts
- Commercial Court of Uganda
- HC: Anti corruption Division (Uganda)
- HC: Civil Division (Uganda)
- HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
- HC: Family Division (Uganda)
- HC: International Crimes Division (Uganda)
- HC: Land Division (Uganda)
- High Court of Uganda
- Industrial Court of Uganda
- Election Petitions of Uganda
- High Court: Execution and Bailiffs Division (Uganda)
Tribunals
- Center for Arbitration and Dispute Resolution of Uganda
- Electricity Disputes Tribunal
- Equal Opportunities Commission
- Insurance Appeals Tribunal (Uganda)
- Leadership Code Tribunal of Uganda
- Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Appeals Tribunal
- Tax Appeals Tribunal (Uganda)
- Uganda Human Rights Commission
- Uganda Registration Services Bureau
Recent judgments
|
Revision application dismissed for late service of notice of motion without seeking the required extension.
* Civil procedure – service of notice of motion – notice of motion treated as notice under Order 49 Rule 2 – must be served in manner and time provided for service of summons (Order 5 Rule 2).
* Civil procedure – time for service – summons to be served within twenty-one days; extension to be sought within fifteen days after expiry.
* Civil procedure – extension/enlargement of time – court discretion to extend but only on application; failure to apply is fatal.
* Procedural compliance – non-compliance with service timelines can lead to dismissal of application with costs.
|
13 November 2025 |
|
Applicant’s claim of sovereign/diplomatic immunity failed; court upheld jurisdiction and the default judgment, awarding costs to respondents.
Sovereign/diplomatic immunity – corporate agency v. state organ – USADF established as corporate body suable in foreign courts; service of process – diplomatic channels not required for independent corporate agencies; commercial activity exception to diplomatic immunity; setting aside ex parte/default judgment – sufficiency of cause and compliance with statutory timelines.
|
13 November 2025 |
|
Court refused to set aside an arbitral award; found delay and interest rate did not vitiate the award and ordered enforcement.
* Arbitration — setting aside award — timeliness — one‑month limit for filing set‑aside applications under section 34(3).
* Arbitration — court jurisdiction — power to set aside awards under section 34 and limited supervisory role.
* Arbitration — delay in making award — delay alone not a ground to set aside absent prejudice or patent illegality; arbitrator may extend time.
* Public policy — challenge to interest award — narrow test; tribunal's discretionary award of interest under section 26(2) Civil Procedure Act upheld.
* Enforcement — where set‑aside application is refused or time to apply has expired, award enforceable as decree under section 36.
|
13 November 2025 |
|
Court allowed limited amendment of plaint; late service of reply not fatal and locus standi objection deemed premature.
Civil procedure – Amendment of pleadings – Order 6 Rule 19 CPR – Amendments to be freely allowed before hearing unless they introduce a new cause of action or cause irremediable injustice; service of affidavit in reply – late service not fatal if served within reasonable time before hearing; preliminary objections on locus standi premature in amendment proceedings.
|
13 November 2025 |
|
Written sale agreement upheld; no spousal-consent defect; third party protected as bona fide purchaser; plaintiff's claim dismissed and caveat removed.
Contract evidence – parole evidence rule and Section 92 Evidence Act; proof standards under Sections 101–103 Evidence Act; Land law – family land and spousal consent under Sections 38A/39 Land Act; bona fide purchaser protection; removal of caveat; vacating unsubstantiated claims.
|
11 November 2025 |
|
WhatsApp messages and bank transfers satisfied statutory writing requirement; plaintiff entitled to restitution for unjust enrichment (UGX 325,000,000 plus interest).
* Contracts Act s.10(5) – sufficiency of writing – informal writings (WhatsApp, bank transfers) may be pieced together to satisfy statutory writing requirement; * Restitution / unjust enrichment – money had and received for total failure of consideration; test whether defendant has legal basis to retain benefit; * Evidence – corroboration of oral testimony by predispute documents; * Set‑off – counterclaim damages set off against plaintiff’s restitution; * Interest and costs – discretionary award where litigation prolonged.
|
11 November 2025 |
|
Court extended expired letters of administration two years and ordered inventory filing within three months.
Succession law – Renewal/extension of Letters of Administration – Effect of section 337(2) and discretionary renewal under section 337(4); Administrator's duties – filing Inventory and Accounts; Beneficiary consent and satisfactory performance as factors for extension; Court-imposed conditions and time limits.
|
11 November 2025 |
|
Court allowed amendment of a generalized memorandum of appeal under Section 98, finding no undue prejudice and ordering costs to applicant.
Civil procedure – amendment of memorandum of appeal – Section 98 Civil Procedure Act – discretion to allow amendments – must be exercised judiciously; Appeal grounds – need for specificity; Prejudice – balancing delays against resolving substantive land disputes; Affidavit in reply – no statutory deadline for filing; late filing not automatically struck out.
|
11 November 2025 |
|
Court extended expired letters of administration for two years, ordered inventory filing and corrected the decedent's name.
Succession Act — renewal/extension of Letters of Administration; statutory expiry under s.337(2) and extension under s.337(4); duty to file estate inventory and accounts; beneficiary consent; rectification of decedent's name.
|
11 November 2025 |
|
Counsel’s late attendance amounted to sufficient cause; dismissal set aside and application reinstated.
Civil procedure – setting aside dismissal for non-appearance – Order 9 Rule 23(1) – sufficient cause – counsel's default – inherent jurisdiction (s.98 CPA) – reinstatement.
|
11 November 2025 |
|
Applicant demonstrated bona fide triable issues; unconditional leave to appear and defend in summary suit granted.
Civil procedure – Summary procedure (Order 36) – Leave to appear and defend – Requirement to show bona fide triable issue – Distinction between triable issue and merits – Loan indebtedness and restructuring dispute.
|
11 November 2025 |
|
Judgment on admission requires a clear, unconditional admission to the claim; factual admissions alone were insufficient, application dismissed.
Civil procedure – Judgment on admission (Order 13 r 6) – discretion to grant – requires clear, unambiguous admission to the claim; contextual reading of pleadings; admissions of facts not necessarily admissions of liability – offsets and contractual conditions may negate admission.
|
11 November 2025 |
|
Application for stay of execution dismissed: appeal pending but no demonstrated likelihood of success or irreparable harm.
Stay of execution – pending appeal – requirement to show likelihood of success, imminent threat of execution, irreparable harm and absence of unreasonable delay; monetary decrees ordinarily reversible; security for due performance.
|
11 November 2025 |
|
An alleged lease was invalid because the Chairperson’s letters were unauthorized; the applicant bore responsibility for lawful acquisition.
* Land law – Uganda Land Commission – statutory requirement that the Secretary conduct Commission correspondence (s.51(3) Land Act) – effect of unauthorized Chairperson correspondence.* Public land allocation – validity of purported allocation – commission minute deferring allocation versus subsequent Chairperson letters.* Burden on prospective lessee to ensure lawful acquisition; no duty on Commission to regularize unlawful applicant actions.* Evidence – inadmissibility and legal effect of unauthorized official communications.
|
10 November 2025 |
|
Procurement award set aside for perfunctory staff evaluation and unlawful post-evaluation price adjustment; re-evaluation ordered.
Public procurement — Administrative review — Timeliness of complaint — Disclosure obligations — Confidentiality of evaluation documents — Evaluation procedure — Key staff/sub-contracting — Permissibility and limits of post-evaluation price corrections and negotiations — Remedy: setting aside BEB notice and re-evaluation.
|
10 November 2025 |
|
An appellate court upheld a 37-year sentence for aggravated defilement, finding it not manifestly excessive.
* Criminal law – Aggravated defilement – sentencing range and discretion; appellate interference only where illegal, wrong principle, material factor overlooked, or sentence manifestly harsh or excessive. * Sentencing Guidelines – Third Schedule and statutory range (30 years to death) applicable. * Mitigating and aggravating factors – first offender status, family responsibilities, premeditation, victim’s age and injuries, and lasting harm. * Consistency in sentencing – desirable but not binding; factual differences justify variance.
|
10 November 2025 |
|
A review application that re‑argues substantive or jurisdictional grievances is a disguised appeal and will be dismissed absent an error apparent on the record.
* Civil procedure – Review under Order 46/section 82 – error apparent on face of record, new evidence or other sufficient reason required; review not to serve as disguised appeal. * Corporations – lifting the corporate veil – liability of non‑parties and standard of proof. * Jurisdiction – substantive jurisdictional complaints are appealable. * Delay and diligence – failure to seek timely review/enlargement of time may lead to dismissal. * Execution proceedings and alleged abuse of process.
|
10 November 2025 |
|
Acquittal for aggravated defilement due to insufficient, uncorroborated and medically inconclusive prosecution evidence.
* Criminal law – Sexual offences – Aggravated defilement – prima facie case requirement under Section 74(1) Trial on Indictments Act; Bhatt v R test. * Evidence – Child complainant evidence – need for corroboration and caution. * Medical evidence – hymenal absence without tears or semen is inconclusive; delay in reporting undermines forensic corroboration. * Evidence Act s30 – limits on admissibility of out-of-court statements in the absence of applicable exception.
|
10 November 2025 |
|
Applicants failed to show arguable grounds for leave to appeal a reinstatement order setting aside a dismissal.
* Civil procedure – Leave to appeal – Applicant must show arguable grounds/prospects of success for leave to appeal (Order 44 r2).
* Civil procedure – Service of interlocutory processes – court’s power to enlarge time; leave to serve out of time (section 96; Order 51 r6).
* Civil procedure – Dismissal under Order 9 r17 and setting aside under Order 9 r18 – sufficient cause and exercise of discretion.
* Evidence – Alleged hearsay objection weakened where decision rests on non-notification and court record.
* Abuse of process – Re-litigating an issue already determined by trial court may constitute abuse.
|
10 November 2025 |
|
Appellant proved lineage title; respondents failed to prove acquisition and were adjudged trespassers; appeal allowed with costs.
Land law – ownership by lineage succession; burden of proof under Evidence Act; nemo dat quod non habet; failure to call key witness; trespass – unauthorized entry despite clan directive; striking out vague grounds of appeal.
|
10 November 2025 |
|
Agreement terminated lawfully after plaintiffs received notice (via WhatsApp) of title transfer and failed to pay within 14 days.
Contract law – interpretation of clauses requiring notice and time of essence; electronic communication (WhatsApp) as receipt of information/notice; lawful termination where buyer fails to pay balance within contractual 14-day period; remedy of refund for total failure of consideration; specific performance claim dismissed.
|
8 November 2025 |
|
Suit abated for failure to take out summons for directions within the mandatory 28-day period under Order 11A.
Civil procedure – Order 11A, Rule 1(2) and (6) SI 71-1 – mandatory duty to take out summons for directions within 28 days – failure to comply results in abatement of suit; procedural compliance and consequences.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
Whether contested land and shares form part of the deceased’s estate, validity of caveat, and appropriate administrators.
Succession law – determination of estate property; joint tenancy and right of survivorship; corporate personality and transmission of shares; validity and purpose of caveats in administration proceedings; fit and proper test for appointment of administrators.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
Court ordered discovery of respondent’s 2022 bank statements as material to applicants’ defence, overruling procedural objections.
* Civil procedure – Discovery – Order 10 r.12 – Whether bank statements are discoverable when relevant to defence and within respondent’s control. * Discovery requisites – relevance/materiality, not privileged, possession/control, prior attempts to obtain. * Procedural objections – late submissions and contested rejoinder affidavit – Court’s discretion to avoid technicalities. * Privacy objection to bank statements considered but not pleaded as privilege.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
Court declined to appoint an arbitrator and directed parties to agree or apply to ICAMEK within 20 days.
* Arbitration law – appointment of arbitrators – party autonomy – court intervention limited where institutional appointing authority exists (ICAMEK designated 23 April 2019).
* Civil procedure – interlocutory relief – court to preserve arbitration agreement and refer parties to appointing authority where available.
* Arbitration and Conciliation Act – Sections 2, 9 and 11 – role of appointing authority and limits on judicial appointment.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
An appellate court will not disturb a trial court’s refusal to award costs absent demonstrated abuse or overlooked matters.
* Civil Procedure — Costs — section 27 Civil Procedure Act — costs generally follow the event but are in the court's discretion.
* Appellate review — interference with costs orders — only where discretion is not judiciously exercised or is abused.
* Burden on appellant to show overlooked matters or improper exercise of discretion.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
Limitation and adverse possession do not defeat a spouse’s matrimonial property rights in a subsisting customary marriage.
Family law – Customary marriage – Property acquired during marriage presumed matrimonial property; Limitation Act and adverse possession do not extinguish a spouse’s declaratory claim to matrimonial interest while marriage subsists; transfers of matrimonial land without consultation or dissolution are legally defective.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
An innocent URA error misattributing a TIN must be remedied via statutory data-protection procedures; no civil damages awarded.
Data protection – application of the Data Protection and Privacy Act to public bodies; misuse/misattribution of TINs; correction procedures (s.16) and administrative complaint to the Authority (s.31); Tax Procedures Act s.55/s.66 – offence of using false TIN; innocent administrative error rectified by URA does not automatically give rise to civil damages.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
An affidavit sworn before an advocate not authorised to practise is invalid and vitiates proceedings, warranting dismissal on revision.
* Administrative and procedural law – Commissioner of Oaths (Advocates) Act – only practising advocates with valid practising certificates may act as commissioners for oaths; commission terminates on ceasing to practise. * Evidence – Validity of affidavits – an affidavit sworn before a person not authorised to act as commissioner of oaths is invalid and vitiates proceedings. * Civil Procedure – Order 19 r 3(1) – a defective supporting affidavit goes to the root of the application. * Revision – High Court’s powers under section 83 of the Civil Procedure Act to set aside proceedings founded on invalid affidavits.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
Appeal dismissed for lack of service of the memorandum and for want of prosecution; respondents ordered to pay costs.
Civil procedure – Appeals – Service of memorandum of appeal – falls within timelines for service of process (Order 49(2), Order 5(2)) – affidavit of service required; Civil procedure – Appeals – Want of prosecution – prolonged inaction amounts to abuse of process – dismissal justified; Civil procedure – Registrar’s role under Order 43 r.31 versus party application to dismiss for want of prosecution.
|
7 November 2025 |