Judgments

Review dismissed as time‑barred under s.18 LADASA; review limited to interpretation or new relevant facts.

Whether a business sale effected transfer of employment or valid redundancy and the consequent terminal benefits.

An out‑of‑time, unvalidated notice of appeal cannot support a stay of execution of a money decree.

Registered title prevails over an unlawful customary claim in alienated/urban land; locus in quo upheld; crops claim remanded.

Applicant granted leave to defend summary suit after disclosing bona fide triable issues; absence of draft defence not fatal.

A beneficiary’s caveat is preserved where a prima facie interest and pending suits justify its continued existence.

Withdrawal of a labour reference does not bar refiling; misnomer curable; counsel disqualification requires formal application.

Decree-holder may execute a consent decree despite a caveat, but removing a deceased caveator’s caveat requires notice or joining the estate.

Application to remove caveat dismissed; caveator has arguable interest but must commence suit within 30 days.

Court granted extension to file estate inventory and final account, finding sufficient cause and beneficiary consent.

Registrar finds oppression under s.243 and orders independent valuation and buyout of the applicant’s shares.

Court referred contractual dispute to arbitration and struck out the High Court suit pending arbitration.

Court found arrest and detention violated non‑derogable rights and ordered immediate release and damages.

Revision to set aside magistrate’s land judgment dismissed for lack of jurisdictional evidence and for valid service.

Application for leave to appeal out of time dismissed because the issue was already finally decided (res judicata).

Court corrected an apparent appellate error and ordered eviction to give effect to the appellate decree.

Court granted conditional stay pending appeal but refused stay where applicant had paid consented taxed costs.

Second appeal struck out for failing to raise pure points of law and for vague, fact‑based grounds.

Suit dismissed for want of prosecution where the plaintiff failed to pursue the claim after filing and service.

Plaintiff's failure to extract summons for directions rendered the suit incompetent and warranted dismissal under O. XIA r.6.

Absence of a notice of motion rendered the miscellaneous cause irregular and led to its dismissal.

The court dismissed the applicant's suit for want of prosecution under s 17(2)(a) of the Judicature Act.

Failure to extract summons for directions rendered the plaintiffs' suit incompetent and led to dismissal under Order XIA r6.

Bail refused where applicant failed to prove fixed abode and sureties were neither credible nor financially substantial.

Failure to comply with a valid statutory demand permits winding up and appointment of a provisional liquidator.

Applicant showed serious issues but no irreparable harm; injunction refused and respondent ordered to shortlist applicant.

Court ordered consolidation of two interrelated suits over the same loan and security to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

Bail refused for applicant charged with aggravated trafficking and defilement due to risk of interfering with the victim.

Commissioner exceeded jurisdiction and breached mandatory notice in cancelling the applicant's disputed certificate of title.

Commissioner exceeded jurisdiction by cancelling registered title; such ownership disputes require full trial, not administrative cancellation.