This is the latest version of this Act.
Related documents
- Is amended by Law Revision (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2023
- Is commenced by Access to Information (Commencement) Instrument, 2006
Uganda
Access to Information Act
Chapter 95
- Published in Uganda Gazette 42 on 19 July 2005
- Assented to on 7 July 2005
- Commenced on 20 April 2006 by Access to Information (Commencement) Instrument, 2006
- [This is the version of this document at 31 December 2023.]
- [Note: This legislation was revised and consolidated as at 31 December 2000 and 31 December 2023 by the Law Reform Commission of Uganda. All subsequent amendments have been researched and applied by Laws.Africa for ULII.]
- [Amended by Law Revision (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2023 (Act 17 of 2023) on 28 July 2023]
Part I – Preliminary
1. Application of Act
2. Purpose of Act
The purpose of this Act is—3. Interpretation
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires—“court” means the chief magistrates’ court or the High Court;“currency point” has the value assigned to it in the Schedule to this Act;“information” includes written, visual, aural and electronic information;“information officer” means the chief executive of a public body;“manual” means the manual of functions of, and index of records held by a public body, compiled under section 6;“Minister” means the Minister to whom the functions of the Minister under this Act have for the time being been assigned by the President;“prescribed” means prescribed by regulations made under section 46;“privacy” means the right of a person to keep his or her matters and relationships secret;“proprietary information” means information relating to any manufacturing process, trade secret, trademark, copyright, patent or formula protected by law or by international treaty to which Uganda is a party;“public body” includes a Government Ministry, department, statutory corporation, Authority or Commission;“record” means any recorded information, in any format, including an electronic format in the possession or control of a public body, whether or not that body created it;“relevant authority” means the Minister responsible for that public body or the person designated in writing by that Minister;“request for access” means a request for access to a record of a public body under section 10;“Rules Committee” means the Rules Committee established by section 40 of the Judicature Act;“security” means the protection of Uganda against threats such as crime, criminals and attacks by foreign countries;“sovereignty” means the supremacy of the State;“third party”, in relation to a request for access, means any person, including but not limited to the government of a foreign State, an international organisation or an organ of that government or organisation, other than—(a)the person requesting the record; and(b)a public body.Part II – Access to information and records
4. Right of access
5. Access to information and records
A person’s right of access is, subject to this Act, not affected by—6. Manual of functions and index of records of public body
7. Disclosure and automatic availability of certain records
An information officer shall, once in every two years, publish a description of—8. Information in directory
The Minister shall ensure the publication in every directory issued for general use by the public of the postal and street address, phone and fax number and electronic mail address of the information officer of every public body.9. Information officers
For the purposes of this Act, the chief executive of each public body shall be responsible for ensuring that records of the public body are accessible under this Act.10. Form of request
11. Duty to assist persons
12. Transfer of request
13. Records that cannot be found or do not exist
14. Deferral of access
15. Decision on request and notice
16. Extension of period to deal with request
17. Deemed refusal of request
Where an information officer fails to give the decision on a request for access to the person concerned within the period contemplated under section 15, the information officer is, for the purposes of this Act, regarded as having refused the request.18. Severability
19. Access and forms of access
20. Access to health or other records
An information officer shall refuse access to health records, the disclosure of which would constitute an invasion of personal privacy.21. Preservation of records
Where the information officer receives a request for access to records or information, he or she shall ensure that the records or information concerned are properly preserved until the request is met and where there is an appeal, until all the procedures for appeal are exhausted.Part III – Exemption from access
22. Limitation of application of Part
A provision of this Part under which a request for access to a record is made may not be construed as—23. Access subject to conditions
24. Minutes of Cabinet and of its committees
25. Protection of information relating to privacy of person
26. Protection of commercial information of third party
27. Protection of certain confidential information
28. Protection of safety of persons and property
An information officer—29. Protection of law enforcement and legal proceedings
30. Protection of records privileged from production in legal proceedings
An information officer shall refuse a request for access if the record is privileged from production in legal proceedings unless the person entitled to the privilege has waived the privilege.31. Defence, security and international relations
32. Operations of public bodies
33. Mandatory disclosure in public interest
Notwithstanding any other provision in this Part, an information officer shall grant a request for access to a record of the public body otherwise prohibited under this Part if—Part IV – Third party intervention
34. Notice to third parties
35. Representation by third party
Part V – Complaints and appeals
36. Complaints to chief magistrate
A person may lodge a complaint with the chief magistrate, against the decision of an information officer—37. Appeal to court
Any person aggrieved by the decision of the chief magistrate under section 34, may, within twenty-one days after the decision is communicated to him or her, appeal to the High Court against the decision of the chief magistrate.38. Procedure
The Rules Committee shall, within six months after the commencement of this Act, make rules of procedure for the courts to regulate the procedure in respect of applications made under sections 34 and 39.39. Disclosure of records by court
40. Civil proceedings
41. Decision of court
The court hearing an application under section 37 may, in addition to any other order, grant an order—Part VI – Miscellaneous
42. Annual report
43. Protection of persons releasing information
44. Protection of officers
A public officer, information officer or other person acting on the directions of such a person is not subject to any civil or criminal liability for any act done or omitted to be done in good faith in the exercise or performance of any power or duty under this Act.45. Offences
Any person who with intent to deny a right of access under this Act—46. Regulations
47. Power to amend Schedule
The Minister may, by statutory instrument, with the approval of Cabinet, amend the Schedule to this Act.History of this document
31 December 2023 this version
Chapter 95
Revised Laws 2023
Consolidation
28 July 2023
20 April 2006
19 July 2005
07 July 2005
Assented to
Cited documents 1
Statute
1Documents citing this one 33
Judgment
19|
Unilateral termination without notice or consent was a wrongful summary termination warranting adjusted reimbursement, severance and damages.
* Employment law – Termination v dismissal – notice and payment in lieu – employee’s consent required for payment in lieu; summary termination per Employment Act. * Constitutional law – Right to privacy – employer’s inquiries to third‑party banks do not amount to unlawful search where requests are limited and banks may decline. * Remedies – reimbursement of certain salary/credit loan deductions upheld; home mortgage reimbursement reversed and to be recalculated and offset; severance allowance upheld. * Damages – general damages reduced; aggravated damages awarded; no award for prospective salary arrears or employer pension/NSSF contributions. * Interest and costs – interest at 8% from Industrial Court award; each party to bear own costs.
|
|
Access to Information—jurisdiction—request to view will in Succession Register—whether High Court proper forum—Sections 4, 11, 15, 36 & 37 of Access to Information Act—Section 73 of Evidence Act—will deposited with Administrator General becomes public record—right to information under Article 41 of the Constitution—failure to first apply to Chief Magistrate’s Court—no evidence of denial by information officer—application dismissed for want of jurisdiction |
|
Court dismissed unequal‑pay and access‑to‑information petition, finding no substantial constitutional interpretation issue and insufficient evidence.
Constitutional jurisdiction – Article 137 – distinction between interpretation and enforcement; Equality and non‑discrimination – Article 21 – burden to prove discrimination attributable to prohibited grounds; Equal pay for equal work – Article 40 – differences may be justified by objective factors and statutory autonomy; Access to information – Article 41 and Access to Information Act 2005 – statutory enforcement mechanisms and requirement to exhaust remedies.
|
|
|
|
Applicant's request for JSC and third‑party documents denied due to statutory confidentiality and mandatory Chairperson consent.
* Access to Information Act 2005 – s.28(1)(b) – exemption for records supplied in confidence by third parties; disclosure may be refused where it would prejudice future supply and contrary to public interest. * Judicial Service Act – s.16 – communications between JSC and President not producible without Chairperson's written consent. * Discovery – confidential third‑party material and meeting minutes reflecting such material are exempt from compelled disclosure absent consent or compelling justification.
|
|
Application struck out as time‑barred because administrative review decision was made outside statutory timelines.
Public Procurement — Administrative review timelines — Accounting Officer must decide within 10 days; where decision is made late it is void — Applicant must file to Tribunal within 10 days from expiry — Timelines mandatory; Tribunal has no power to extend time — Late application incompetent and struck out.
|
|
|
|
Registrar lacked jurisdiction and improperly granted an ex parte production order in breach of natural justice; appeal allowed with costs.
Civil procedure – Jurisdiction of Registrar (O.50 r.2–r.3) – limits to uncontested/consent judgments and formal preliminary steps; Access to Information Act – procedural notice requirements; Ex parte orders – permissibility only with urgency or impossibility of service; Natural justice – right to be heard; Irregular/illegal orders liable to be set aside.
|
|
Default judgment set aside where bureaucratic delay and prior extension showed sufficient cause; matter ordered heard inter partes.
Civil procedure – Setting aside ex parte/default judgments – Order 9 Rule 12 – sufficient cause – bureaucratic delay and prior extension of time; Constitutional law – right to fair hearing (Art.28) and substantive justice (Art.126(2)(e)); Access to Information – public interest favouring inter-partes determination; Appellate review – re-appraisal of exercise of discretion.
|
|
Production-sharing agreements are public documents; confidentiality clauses cannot defeat constitutional access to information.
Access to information; public documents – production-sharing agreements as government contracts; Article 41 Constitution and Access to Information Act; Evidence Act s.73; confidentiality clauses cannot override constitutional access right absent demonstrated prejudice to security/sovereignty or privacy.
|