Uganda
Oaths Act
Chapter 21
- Commenced on 9 October 1963
- [This is the version of this document at 31 December 2023.]
- [Note: This legislation was revised and consolidated as at 31 December 2000 and 31 December 2023 by the Law Reform Commission of Uganda. All subsequent amendments have been researched and applied by Laws.Africa for ULII.]
1. Oaths to be taken
The oaths which shall be taken as occasion shall demand shall be the oaths set out in Schedule 1 to this Act.2. Officers to take oaths
A person appointed to an office set out in the second column of Schedule 2 to this Act shall take the oath specified in the first column of the Schedule which shall be administered by the authority specified in the third column of the Schedule.3. Unnecessary repetition of Oaths
4. Omission to take oath or make affirmation
Nothing in this Act shall render, be deemed to render or be deemed to have rendered invalid any act done or which hereafter may be done by a public officer in the execution or intended execution of his or her official duties by reason only of the omission by the public officer to take any oath or to make any affirmation which the officer should take or should have taken or should make or should have made; except that any person who declines, neglects or omits to take the required oath or make the required affirmation under this Act shall—5. Form and manner in which oath may be taken
6. Place and date of oath
Every commissioner for oaths or notary public before whom any oath or affidavit is taken or made under this Act shall state truly in the jurat or attestation at what place and on what date the oath or affidavit is taken or made.7. Absence of religious belief
Where an oath has been duly administered and taken, the fact that the person to whom it was administered had, at the time of taking the oath, no religious belief, shall not for any purpose affect the validity of the oath.8. Affirmation
A person who objects to the taking of an oath and desires to make an affirmation in lieu of the oath may do so without being questioned as to the grounds of that objection or desire, or otherwise; and in any such case, the form of the required oath shall be varied by the substitution for the words of swearing, the words, “I solemnly, sincerely and truthfully affirm that....”, and such other consequential variations of form as may be necessary shall thereupon be made; except that in any case where the Oath of Allegiance is taken, for the words “truthfully affirm” in this section there shall be substituted the words “truly declare and affirm”, and the words “So help me God” shall be omitted.9. Persons under age
10. Corroboration
A person shall not be convicted or judgment given upon the uncorroborated evidence of a person who shall have given his or her evidence without oath or affirmation.11. Authority to administer oaths
12. Taking oaths out of Uganda
13. Powers of Uganda officials abroad
14. Additional oaths
History of this document
31 December 2023 this version
Chapter 21
Revised Laws 2023
Consolidation
31 December 2000
09 October 1963
Commenced
Cited documents 1
Statute
1Documents citing this one 182
Judgment
165|
|
|
Supreme Court dismissed appeal on electoral irregularities due to insufficient proof of substantial result effects.
Election law – Parliamentary elections – Non-compliance with electoral laws – Effects on election results – Evidential requirements for Declaration of Results forms.
|
|
|
|
Failure to serve notice within seven days is a technical irregularity absent prejudice; Electoral Commission’s breaches annulled the election.
* Electoral law – service of Notice of Presentation of petition – requirement directory, not jurisdictional, where no prejudice. * Evidence – affidavits in election petitions – liberal approach to illiterate deponents; exclusion warranted for hearsay or matters beyond personal knowledge. * Electoral Commission duty – proper counting, certification and accounting of ballots; failure may substantially affect results. * Relief – where non‑compliance substantially affects result, election may be annulled and fresh election ordered. * Costs – where Commission’s failures cause annulment, Commission liable for costs.
|
|
|
|
Civil Procedure|Actions and applications |
|
|
|
Application to set aside dismissal refused because unsworn witness statements were inadmissible and plaintiffs failed to prove their case.
* Civil procedure – review – inherent jurisdiction (s.33 Judicature Act; s.98 Civil Procedure Act) – limits where specific review provisions exist (Order 46 CPR).
* Evidence – admissibility – unsworn witness statements not admissible to discharge burden of proof (s.101 Evidence Act; s.10 Oaths Act).
* Ex parte proceedings – burden of proof remains on plaintiff; ex parte does not lower evidentiary standard.
|
|
Application to set aside summary judgment for alleged duress and defective service dismissed; service effective and duress unproven.
Civil procedure – Order 36 r.11 CPR – setting aside summary judgment for ineffective service or good cause; substituted service – requirements and validity; duress – standard of proof for vitiating consent; jurat technicalities – sworn vs affirmed not fatal.
|
|
Non‑compliance, bribery, use of a government vehicle and ballot anomalies nullified the election and fresh polls were ordered.
Election law – electoral irregularities – non‑compliance with Parliamentary Elections Act – use of government resources for campaigning – bribery and distribution of gifts – unexplained ballot paper discrepancies – harassment/arrests of agents – standard and burden of proof in election petitions.
|