Ssekandi v Mbabali [2017] UGSC 67 (17 March 2017)

Civil Procedure
Case summary
From the evidence that was on record, it was found that the respondent applied for but the records were not yet ready as the records did not have judgment of one Justice, but later it was included.   The court found that the respondent was not vigilant, as he failed to fill the available record and later file the remaining concurring judgment as a supplementary record.   Therefore, it was found that the respondent failed to act with vigor in the process. Accordingly, the application was allowed, and the Notice of Appeal was struck out.

Loading PDF...

This document is 4.0 MB. Do you want to load it?

▲ To the top