Bireete Sarah v Uganda [2016] UGSC 34 (15 June 2016)

Criminal law
Case summary
The court found that Article 26 was inapplicable in this application, however, it was stated that mistake of counsel could not be visited on the applicant. Thus, court invoked Article 126 to cure the technicality.   Further, court found that the applicant had successfully met and proved the essential conditions for the grant of the application.   Accordingly, the application for bail was granted.

Loading PDF...

This document is 2.9 MB. Do you want to load it?

▲ To the top