Mukasa v Baife & Anor (CIVIL APPEAL NO. MM 40/1988.) [1990] UGHCCD 1 (8 May 1990)

Civil Procedure
Case summary
The court found that counsel for the appellant had omitted to add the second respondent. It was further stated that amending the memorandum of appeal to add the second respondent could not in any way cause injustice to the first respondent. As regards the second ground of appeal, the court invoked the inherent powers of the court to grant the remedy.   The court therefore found no merit in the objection of the application by the respondent.     The appeal was thereby allowed.

Loading PDF...

This document is 2.1 MB. Do you want to load it?

▲ To the top