- Flynote
- Property Law|Mortgage, loans and bonds|Mortgage
- Case summary
- The court held that as the first appellate court, it is required to re appraise the evidence and reach an independent conclusion. That the receipt of the letter that prompted the appellant to ask for the meeting with the respondent amounted to a notice under the law. That from the evidence, the appellant didn’t prove that the respondent had accepted his proposal.
Loading PDF...
This document is 517.7 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 0
Documents citing this one 1
Judgment 1
1. | Potters Hand Limited v Tirupati Development (U) Limited and Another (Civil Suit 469 of 2017) [2024] UGHCLD 86 (26 March 2024) |