Baingana & 3 Ors v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 2013) [2018] UGCA 66 (30 July 2018)

Evidence Law|Evaluation of Evidence|Review of Evidence
Case summary
Court re-evaluated the evidence and held that the trial judge was misdirected to rely on circumstantial evidence that allegedly placed the first, second and third appellants at the scene of crime.

Loading PDF...

This document is 3.9 MB. Do you want to load it?

▲ To the top