Entebbe handling services Vs Uganda Fish Packers (Civil Appeal No. 0030 of 2010) [2018] UGCA 116 (7 November 2018)

Flynote

Civil Procedure|Appeals and reviews|Delict and Tort Law|Negligence

Case summary

The court held that indeed the appellant owed the respondent a duty of care but it discharged it since only a few kilograms of fish were rejected. That in reaching the amount in the award of the damages, the price of fish was not proved and hence an improper evaluation of the evidence.

---